Joshua 11-24 Study Guide: Inheritance, Refuge, and Rest

STUDY GUIDE

The Lines Have Fallen

Inheritance, Refuge, Rest, and the Heir in Joshua 11-24

A study for small groups, Sunday school classes, and Bible college seminars

By Dr. Shawn M. Greener Through the Bible in a Year: Walking the Story of God | Sunday Summation and Deepening, Days 140-144

© 2026 Dr. Shawn M. Greener. All Rights Reserved. Permission to copy: you may print and photocopy this study guide in full, without charge, for use in churches, small groups, classrooms, and personal study, provided it is unedited and this notice remains intact. It may not be sold or posted as part of a paid product.

How to Use This Guide

Watch first. Each part of this guide pairs with an episode of True Word, Faith for LIFE with Dr. Shawn on YouTube. Groups get the most from it when members watch the matching episode before they meet: https://www.youtube.com/@DrShawnMichaelGreener

Small group (one 75-minute session on the whole week):

Sunday school (five weeks):

Bible college seminar unit (two weeks, two sessions):

• Session 1, "Land as Gift: Nachalah in Joshua and the Torah." Readings: Joshua 13-21; Leviticus 25; Numbers 18, 27, 36; C. J. H. Wright, God's People in God's Land, chapters on family and land; Hess, Joshua, introduction. Seminar questions 1-4 in Part Eight.
• Session 2, "Inheritance Fulfilled: Rest, Refuge, and the Heir." Readings: Joshua 20-24; Psalm 16; Hebrews 1-4, 6, 9; Romans 8 and 11; Ephesians 1 and 3; Lane, Hebrews 1-8, on Heb. 3:7-4:13; Moo, Romans, on Rom. 11. Seminar questions 5-8 in Part Eight. A written assignment from Part Eight is due at the end of the unit.

The Big Idea

What you hold, you hold in trust. The portion that can't be lost is God Himself. In Yeshua, the Heir, that portion is offered to all who come to Him, while God's irrevocable calling on Israel stands.

Joshua 11-24 looks like a land survey. It is a theology of inheritance. The land is a nachalah, a gift received and held in trust, never bought and never sold for good. One tribe, Levi, receives no territory because the LORD Himself is its inheritance, and David takes that Levitical portion as his own confession in Psalm 16. The rest Joshua gives is real and unfinished, pointing ahead to the rest that "remains" (Hebrews 4:9). Yeshua is the Heir of all things, and through His death and resurrection He makes the nations fellow heirs with Israel.

Learning Objectives

By the end of this study, participants will be able to:

1. Trace the movement of Joshua 11-24 from conquest, to allotment, to refuge, to covenant renewal.
2. Define nachalah, goral, chevel, and cheleq, and explain how Psalm 16:5-6 gathers all four.
3. Explain why the land of Israel could not be sold "in perpetuity" (Leviticus 25:23), and what that means for how believers hold what they own.
4. Describe how the cities of refuge worked, and why the death of the high priest released the manslayer.
5. Distinguish the two Hebrew words for rest in Joshua (shaqat and nuach) and connect them to Hebrews 3-4.
6. Show how the New Testament language of inheritance (kleros, meris, kleronomia, arrabon) grows from Joshua and the Torah.
7. Articulate, from Romans 9-11, why Gentile believers are fellow heirs with Israel rather than replacements for Israel.
8. Choose one concrete practice for handing on a living witness to the next generation.

Primary Readings

• Joshua 11-24 (the whole week's text)
• Numbers 13-14 (the spies; Caleb's promise)
• Numbers 18:20-24; Deuteronomy 10:8-9 (the LORD as Levi's portion)
• Numbers 27:1-11; 36:1-13 (the daughters of Zelophehad)
• Numbers 35; Deuteronomy 19:1-14 (cities of refuge; the boundary stone)
• Leviticus 25:8-34 (Jubilee and the land held in trust)
• Psalm 16 (the lines have fallen)
• Hebrews 3:7-4:13; 6:13-20; 9:11-15 (rest; refuge; the High Priest)
• Romans 8:14-17; 11:1-36; Ephesians 1:11-14; 3:6; Colossians 1:12; 1 Peter 1:3-5 (inheritance in Yeshua; Israel's calling)

Key Terms

Part One: Background

Where we are in the story. Joshua 1-12 tells how Israel entered the land; Joshua 13-21 tells how it was distributed; Joshua 22-24 tells how Israel was charged to keep it. This week covers the end of the campaign (11-12), the whole distribution (13-21), and the closing covenant (22-24).

The northern war. Hazor was the largest city in Canaan, and Joshua 11:10 calls it "the head of all those kingdoms." Its kings appear in the fourteenth-century BC Amarna letters written to Pharaoh's court, and the city is named in the eighteenth-century BC archives of Mari on the Euphrates.[^1] Excavators have uncovered a violent Late Bronze Age destruction of its ceremonial palace. The cause and the date are debated.[^2]

Seven years. Caleb was forty at Kadesh-barnea (14:7) and eighty-five at the allotment (14:10). Subtract the thirty-eight years from Kadesh to the Zered (Deuteronomy 2:14), and the conquest ran about seven years. That sits behind Joshua 11:18: "Joshua made war a long time."[^3]

Who was Caleb? He's called "the Kenizzite" (14:6, 14). Kenaz appears as an Edomite clan name (Genesis 36:11, 15, 42), and the Kenizzites are listed among the peoples of the land (Genesis 15:19). Many scholars conclude that Caleb's clan came from outside Israel and was absorbed into Judah. Others read Kenaz as a Judahite family name.[^4] Either way, the man most praised for whole-hearted faith stands at the edge of Israel's family tree, like Rahab before him.

Land as gift. In the ancient Near East, a king's land grant made the land truly the grantee's, but the grant still had to be taken up: borders walked, boundary stones set, the land worked. Babylonian kudurru stones recorded such grants and cursed anyone who moved the boundary.[^5] Israel's law guarded the same thing: "You shall not move your neighbor's landmark... in the inheritance that you will hold" (Deuteronomy 19:14). Unlike every other ancient king, Israel's King kept the title: "the land is mine" (Leviticus 25:23).[^6]

Shiloh. In Joshua 18:1 the tent of meeting moves from Gilgal at the edge of the land to Shiloh in the hill country of Ephraim, near the center. It stands there through the era of the judges until the days of Eli (1 Samuel 1-4). Excavations at Shiloh have uncovered Iron Age I occupation, and the site's history is still being written.[^7]

Covenant form. Joshua 24 follows the shape of Late Bronze Age suzerain treaties: preamble, historical prologue, stipulations, deposit of the text, witnesses, blessings and curses. Scholars debate how directly Israel borrowed the Hittite pattern.[^8]

Part Two: The Week's Five Threads

Thread One: The fight was long because the gift was big (Day 140, Joshua 11-13)

Key texts: Joshua 11:6, 15, 18, 23; 13:1, 6; Psalm 20:7; Exodus 23:29-30.

God called the land given before the first battle (1:3), and the war still took years. In the middle of it God commanded Israel to hamstring the horses and burn the chariots (11:6, 9), so Israel would not trust the weapon instead of the LORD (Psalm 20:7). Chapter 12 reduces thirty-one kings to one line each. Then God tells an old man, "There remains yet very much land to possess," and promises, "I myself will drive them out" (13:1, 6). Joshua 11:15 says he "left nothing undone." The Hebrew is literally "he did not remove a word" (lo hesir davar).

Discussion questions

1. What "chariot" are you tempted to trust instead of God? What would it look like to let Him burn it?
2. Joshua 11:18 compresses years of war into one sentence. Which hard season of your life will someday read as one line?
3. How does God's promise in 13:6, "I myself will drive them out," change the way an older believer can look at unfinished work?

Thread Two: Wholehearted until the end (Day 141, Joshua 14-16)

Key texts: Numbers 13:30; 14:24; Joshua 14:6-15; 15:13-19.

Three times in Joshua 14, Caleb "wholly followed the LORD" (14:8, 9, 14). The Hebrew is mille acharei, "to fill up after."[^9] At eighty-five he asks for the hill country of the Anakim, the very ground that terrified Israel (Numbers 13:28-33), and he drives out the same three giants named forty-five years earlier (Numbers 13:22; Joshua 15:14). His request is humble: "It may be that the LORD will be with me" (14:12). His daughter Achsah learns the pattern. She asks her father for springs and receives upper and lower springs (15:18-19).[^10]

Discussion questions

1. Caleb asked for the hardest ground at eighty-five. What does "asking for the mountain" look like at your stage of life?
2. How is "It may be that the LORD will be with me" different from both doubt and presumption?
3. Achsah had land that was dry. Where are you living on "dry ground" because asking again feels impolite with God?

Thread Three: Don't let your hands go slack (Day 142, Joshua 17-19)

Key texts: Joshua 17:3-6, 14-18; 18:1-10; 19:49-51; Numbers 27:1-11.

Seven tribes sit in camp on land God has already given. "How long will you put off going in?" (18:3). The verb is rafah in its reflexive form, "to let yourselves go slack," the same root God used when He promised Joshua, "I will not leave you" (1:5), literally, I will not let you drop.[^11] Joseph's tribes complain about space and are told to clear the forest (17:15-18); the verb for "clear" is spelled like the "create" of Genesis 1:1, though most lexicons treat them as two words.[^12] Beside them stand the daughters of Zelophehad, who asked Moses years earlier and now show up to claim what God promised (17:3-6).[^13] And Joshua, who led every battle, takes his own inheritance last (19:49-50).

Discussion questions

1. Where have you called it "waiting on God" when it was really slack hands? How can you tell the difference?
2. The daughters of Zelophehad asked, waited, and then showed up. Which of those three is hardest for you?
3. What would it mean for you, like Joshua, to take your "inheritance" last?

Thread Four: There is a refuge for the one who never meant the harm (Day 143, Joshua 20-22)

Key texts: Joshua 20:1-9; 21:43-45; 22:10-34; Numbers 35:9-34; Deuteronomy 19:1-13; Hebrews 6:18-20.

Six cities, three on each side of the Jordan, stand open to "the manslayer who strikes any person without intent or unknowingly" (20:3). He runs, stands at the gate, tells his case, and is taken in (20:4). The avenger of blood, the go'el haddam, cannot touch him there (20:5). He remains "until the death of him who is high priest at the time" (20:6), and then he goes home.[^14] The refuge is open "for the stranger sojourning among them" too (20:9). All six are Levitical cities (chapter 21).[^15] Then the narrator's great summary: "Not one word of all the good promises... had failed; all came to pass" (21:45). And chapter 22 shows a nation one step from civil war over a misunderstood altar, rescued because someone went and asked.[^16]

Discussion questions

1. The manslayer didn't clean himself up first; he showed up and told it straight. Why is that order so hard for us?
2. Why do you think the release came with the high priest's death, and not after a fixed number of years?
3. Joshua 22 nearly ended in war over an assumption. Who do you need to "go and ask" before you assume the worst?

Thread Five: Choose in front of them (Day 144, Joshua 23-24)

Key texts: Joshua 23:8, 14; 24:2, 13-27, 29-32; Judges 2:7-10; Genesis 35:1-4; 50:24-26.

Joshua's last charge is to cling (davaq) to the LORD (23:8), the marriage word of Genesis 2:24.[^17] At Shechem, where Jacob once buried his household's idols (Genesis 35:4), Joshua retells the story from Terah's idols to the gift of the land (24:2-13), calls for wholeness and truth (tamim and emet, 24:14), and declares, "As for me and my house, we will serve the LORD" (24:15). When the people promise, he answers, "You are not able to serve the LORD, for he is a holy God" (24:19).[^18] He writes the covenant and sets up a stone that "has heard all the words of the LORD" (24:26-27). Israel serves the LORD through the days of Joshua and the elders after him (24:31). One generation later "there arose another generation... who did not know the LORD" (Judges 2:10). The book closes with Joseph's bones buried at Shechem (24:32).[^19]

Discussion questions

1. Joshua couldn't choose for Israel; he could only choose in front of them. Who is watching you choose?
2. Why would Joshua tell a willing crowd, "You are not able"? Is that discouragement or mercy?
3. What story would you tell your grandchildren if you had one page, the way Joshua told Israel's story in 24:2-13?

Part Three: The Architecture of the Allotment

Joshua 13-21 is built with care. Tables carry the structure; the commentary below carries the argument.

Three features stand out. First, the two faithful spies frame the western allotment. Caleb's inheritance is the first one given (14:6-15) and Joshua's is the last (19:49-51). The men who believed God in Numbers 14 receive their reward at both ends of the map, and the leader takes his last.[^20] Second, Shiloh is the hinge. God's presence is set at the center of the land (18:1) before the remaining seven tribes receive their lots, and the lots are cast "before the LORD" there (18:6, 8, 10). Some scholars argue that 18:1 is the center of the whole book.[^21] Third, Levi is mentioned before anyone else gets anything, and over and over after (13:14, 33; 14:3-4; 18:7), until chapter 21 scatters the Levites through every tribe. The landless tribe is the thread stitching the whole map together.

Part Four: The Theological Center

Inheritance held in trust. A nachalah is received, not purchased, and it can't be permanently sold. "The land shall not be sold in perpetuity, for the land is mine. For you are strangers and sojourners with me" (Leviticus 25:23).[^22] Jubilee returned land to its family every fiftieth year (Leviticus 25:10-13), and Naboth refused even a king, because his vineyard was "the inheritance of my fathers" (1 Kings 21:3). The daughters of Zelophehad fought for the same principle: a family's nachalah must not disappear from its name (Numbers 27:4).[^23] Israel's relationship to the land was stewardship under the true Owner. And when a family lost its land, the go'el, the nearest kinsman, was charged to redeem it (Leviticus 25:25; Ruth 4:3-10). The same word names the avenger of blood in Joshua 20:3-5: one kinsman, two duties, blood and inheritance.[^23a]

The portion that is God. Levi received no tribal territory, only forty-eight towns with pasturelands among the other tribes (21:41-42). "I am your portion and your inheritance among the people of Israel" (Numbers 18:20); "the priesthood of the LORD is their heritage" (Joshua 18:7). The tribe with no land of its own held the richest portion in Israel. Psalm 16 takes up that portion in Joshua's own vocabulary: cheleq (portion), goral (lot), chavalim (lines), and nachalah (inheritance), with the same verb, naphal (fell), that Joshua 17:5 uses for Manasseh's portions. The psalm is titled "of David," a man of Judah who claims the Levite's portion as his own.[^24]

Rest, real and unfinished. Joshua uses two words for rest. Shaqat (11:23) means the land was quiet; the fighting stopped. Nuach (21:44; 23:1) is the verb of God's own Sabbath rest (Exodus 20:11) and of Deuteronomy's promised rest (Deuteronomy 12:9-10).[^25] Yet "very much land" remained (13:1), and Judges 1 lists the cities never taken. Some of that was disobedience (Judges 2:1-3, 20-21). Some was God's design: "Little by little I will drive them out" (Exodus 23:29-30; Deuteronomy 7:22).[^26] The rest was real, and the rest was not finished. Hebrews 4:8-9 draws the conclusion: "If Joshua had given them rest, God would not have spoken of another day later on. So then, there remains a Sabbath rest for the people of God."[^27]

What lasts. Joshua's answer to "What will you leave behind?" comes in three parts. What you hold, you hold in trust. The deepest portion you will ever have is God Himself. And the rest you long for is real, but it's still ahead.

Part Five: Fulfillment in Yeshua, and Israel's Irrevocable Calling

The Heir of all things. God "has spoken to us by his Son, whom he appointed the heir of all things" (Hebrews 1:2). Every nachalah in Joshua finally belongs to Him. In the parable of the tenants, the vineyard keepers say, "This is the heir. Come, let us kill him, and the inheritance will be ours" (Mark 12:7). Mark tells us the leaders "perceived that he had told the parable against them" (12:12). The parable indicts the tenants who rejected the Son. It is not a verdict that God has discarded the vineyard He planted (Isaiah 5:1-7).[^28]

The inheritance given through the Heir's death. The Heir was killed, and God made His death the way the inheritance comes to us. Hebrews 9:15 joins the three ideas: a mediator, a death that "redeems," and "the promised eternal inheritance." The parable of the tenants (Mark 12) shows the rejection; Hebrews explains the redemption. "If children, then heirs, heirs of God and fellow heirs with Christ" (Romans 8:17). Yeshua acts as the family's go'el: God sent His Son "to redeem those who were under the law," and "if a son, then an heir through God" (Galatians 4:4-7). The Father "has qualified you to share in the inheritance of the saints in light" (Colossians 1:12). Paul's Greek pairs meris and kleros, portion and lot, the same pair the Greek Old Testament uses for Levi's lack of land (Deuteronomy 10:9).[^29] The Spirit is "the guarantee of our inheritance" (Ephesians 1:14); arrabon is a Semitic loanword, the eravon that Judah left with Tamar as a pledge of full payment (Genesis 38:17-20).[^30] And the inheritance itself is "imperishable, undefiled, and unfading, kept in heaven for you" (1 Peter 1:4).

The High Priest who died, and lives. The manslayer went home when the high priest died (Joshua 20:6). Yeshua "entered once for all into the holy places... by means of his own blood, thus securing an eternal redemption" (Hebrews 9:12). Believers "have fled for refuge" to the hope set before them (Hebrews 6:18). And unlike every high priest of Israel, Yeshua rose and "always lives to make intercession" (Hebrews 7:25). His death closed the case; His life keeps the gate open.[^31]

The second Joshua and the rest that remains. Joshua's Hebrew name, Yehoshua, and Jesus' name share one Greek form, Iesous (Hebrews 4:8). Joshua son of Nun gave Israel real rest in the land. Yeshua the Messiah says, "Come to me, all who labor and are heavy laden, and I will give you rest" (Matthew 11:28).

Israel's irrevocable calling. The New Testament language of inheritance never transfers Israel's nachalah to someone else. Gentile believers are "fellow heirs" (Ephesians 3:6), heirs with Israel. God gave Abraham's offspring the land "for an everlasting possession" (Genesis 17:8), and Paul insists that "the gifts and the calling of God are irrevocable" (Romans 11:29). He warns the grafted-in branches, "do not be arrogant toward the branches" (Romans 11:18), and looks ahead to the day when "all Israel will be saved" (Romans 11:26). Christians have argued for centuries about how the land promise relates to the New Covenant. This guide holds that the nations are welcomed into the family that holds the deed. They are not seizing Israel's portion.[^32]

Part Six: Translation Tensions

The most important tension for this week is the first. Every English version says "rest" in both 11:23 and 21:44, and the reader never sees that two different verbs stand behind it. Don't overload the verbs; they overlap in meaning. But the book's movement from a quiet land (11:23) to rest given by the LORD (21:44), alongside "very much land" still remaining (13:1), is the gap Hebrews 4 builds on.

Part Seven: Practice

Seven mornings with the inheritance:

1. Day 1. Read Psalm 16 aloud. Circle portion, lot, lines, inheritance. Pray verse 5 in the first person.
2. Day 2. Write three things God has given you that no estate sale could sell. Read Psalm 16:6 over the list.
3. Day 3. Read Joshua 18:3. Name one thing you've put off for those who come after you (a will, a medical directive, a closet, a conversation). Do step one before dark.
4. Day 4. Read Joshua 14:6-12. Write down one "mountain" you stopped asking God for. Date it and pray it.
5. Day 5. Read Joshua 20:1-6 and Hebrews 6:18-20. Tell God, out loud, any case you've been running from.
6. Day 6. Write your Joshua 24: one page to a child or grandchild. Begin "Long ago..." End with Joshua 24:15. Send it or read it aloud.
7. Day 7. Read 1 Peter 1:3-5 and Romans 11:28-29. Pray by name for those you hope will inherit your faith, and for Israel.

For groups: Close each session by reading Psalm 16:5-6 together. Invite anyone who wrote a Joshua 24 letter to read the first three sentences aloud.

Closing prayer: Adonai, You are our portion. Everything we hold, we hold in trust from You. Burn our chariots, fill our hearts, strengthen our slack hands, shelter us at the gate, and let our witness outlive us. Thank You for Israel, whose calling You have never revoked, and for Yeshua, the Heir who made us fellow heirs. Amen.

Part Eight: Questions and Assignments

Group questions

1. Have you ever been to an estate sale, or cleared out a loved one's home? What did it teach you about what lasts?
2. Which of the five threads describes your season right now: the long fight, the whole heart, slack hands, the refuge, or the choice?
3. What would change in how you handle money and possessions if you truly believed "the land is mine" (Leviticus 25:23)?
4. Levi had no land and held the richest portion. Where has losing something opened your hands to God?
5. If God paced Israel's inheritance "little by little," what unfinished area of your life might be God's pacing rather than your failure?
6. How does being a "fellow heir" with Israel shape the way you pray for and speak about the Jewish people?

Seminar questions

1. Evaluate the claim that Joshua 18:1 is the structural center of the book. What does the location of the tent of meeting contribute to the theology of the allotment?
2. Compare nachalah in Joshua with the ancient Near Eastern royal land grant. Where is Israel's view of land distinctive?
3. Assess the relationship between Joshua 11:23 ("the land had rest") and 13:1 ("very much land remains"). Is the book contradicting itself, or making a theological point?
4. Psalm 16 is attributed to David yet uses Levitical "portion" language. What does this suggest about how Israel's worship read the land traditions?
5. How does Hebrews 3:7-4:13 use Joshua? Is its reading of "rest" faithful to the Hebrew distinctions in Joshua?
6. Why does release from the city of refuge depend on the high priest's death? Evaluate rabbinic and Christian interpretations.
7. How should Mark 12:1-12 be read so that it does not become a charter for replacement theology?
8. Romans 11:29 says God's calling is irrevocable. What does that imply for a Christian theology of the land promise? Engage at least two views.

Research and writing assignments

1. Exegetical paper (2,500-3,000 words): "The Lines Have Fallen: Psalm 16:5-6 as a Reading of Joshua 13-21." Work from the Hebrew of both texts.
2. Background paper (2,000 words): Compare Babylonian kudurru land grants with the nachalah of Leviticus 25 and Joshua 13-21. Use Slanski and Wright.
3. Theological essay (2,500 words): "The Death of the High Priest: Joshua 20, the Rabbis, and Hebrews." Engage Milgrom, Greenberg, and Lane.
4. Archaeology review (1,500 words): Summarize the debate over the Late Bronze Age destruction of Hazor (Ben-Tor versus Zuckerman) and assess what it can and cannot tell us about Joshua 11.
5. Pastoral project: Write a four-week adult class on legacy and inheritance built on Joshua 14, 18, 20, and 24, with one concrete practice per week.

Leader's Notes

This study touches tender places. Read these before you lead.

• Grief. Someone in your room may have just cleared out a parent's home or attended a funeral. The estate-sale image can open fresh grief. Pause, acknowledge it, and let silence do some work. Don't rush to the application.
• Prodigal children and grandchildren. Parents of adult children who have walked away from faith often carry shame. Joshua 24 teaches that you can't choose for them. Make it clear that their children's choices aren't a verdict on their parenting, and that God kept His promise to Joseph across centuries.
• Harm we never meant. Thread Four can surface accidents: a car crash, a workplace injury, a medical decision that went wrong. Never ask anyone to disclose details. Offer private follow-up, and if someone is carrying trauma, help them connect with a pastor or a licensed counselor.
• Aging and mortality. For older members, "What will you leave behind?" lands close to home. Emphasize Caleb at eighty-five: older saints aren't finished, and God still says, "I myself will drive them out."
• Wills and family conflict. The practice of "doing the thing you've put off" may raise inheritance disputes in families. Keep the focus on stewardship and peace, and point people to qualified legal help for legal questions.
• Women and inheritance. The daughters of Zelophehad and Achsah are bold, faithful women who asked and received. Let their courage be seen without turning them into a debate.
• The violence of the conquest. Bible college students, and some group members, will ask how God could command the wars of Joshua. Take the question seriously. Point to the limited, unrepeatable nature of the conquest, the long patience of God toward Canaan (Genesis 15:16), Rahab and the Gibeonites as signs of mercy, and the scholarly discussion in the bibliography (Walton and Walton; Heiser). Don't pretend the question is easy.
• Israel and the land. This topic can drift into current politics. Keep the group in the text: Genesis 17:8, Romans 9-11, and Ephesians 3:6. The guide's position is clear: God's calling on Israel is irrevocable, and Gentile believers are fellow heirs, not replacements.

Notes

[^1]: William L. Moran, ed. and trans., The Amarna Letters (Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1992), EA 227-228 (letters from the king of Hazor) and EA 148 (Abi-Milku of Tyre's complaint about the king of Hazor). On Hazor in the Mari archives, see Amnon Ben-Tor, Hazor: Canaanite Metropolis, Israelite City (Jerusalem: Israel Exploration Society, 2016).

[^2]: Ben-Tor, Hazor, attributes the Late Bronze destruction of the ceremonial palace to the Israelites, as Yigael Yadin had before him. Sharon Zuckerman, "Anatomy of a Destruction: Crisis Architecture, Termination Rituals and the Fall of Canaanite Hazor," Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology 20, no. 1 (2007): 3-32, argues for an internal uprising. The archaeology confirms a violent destruction; it cannot by itself name the attacker. Joshua 11:10-13 gives the theological meaning.

[^3]: The calculation assumes Deut. 2:14's thirty-eight years run from the departure from Kadesh-barnea to the crossing of the Zered, shortly before the Jordan crossing. See Richard S. Hess, Joshua: An Introduction and Commentary, Tyndale Old Testament Commentaries 6 (Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1996), on Josh. 14:6-15. Some interpreters allow a slightly longer span.

[^4]: Hess, Joshua, on Josh. 14:6; David M. Howard Jr., Joshua, New American Commentary 5 (Nashville: Broadman & Holman, 1998), on Josh. 14:6. Compare Gen. 15:19; 36:11, 15, 42; Num. 32:12; 1 Chr. 4:13-15. The Edomite connection is widely held but not certain.

[^5]: Kathryn E. Slanski, The Babylonian Entitlement narûs (kudurrus): A Study in Their Form and Function, ASOR Books 9 (Boston: American Schools of Oriental Research, 2003). Slanski argues the monuments functioned as public, sacred records of royal grants rather than literal field markers; either way they show how seriously the ancient world guarded granted land.

[^6]: Christopher J. H. Wright, God's People in God's Land: Family, Land, and Property in the Old Testament (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1990). Wright's treatment of divine ownership and family inheritance remains the standard evangelical study.

[^7]: Israel Finkelstein, ed., Shiloh: The Archaeology of a Biblical Site, Monograph Series of the Institute of Archaeology of Tel Aviv University 10 (Tel Aviv: Institute of Archaeology, 1993). Excavations led by Scott Stripling for the Associates for Biblical Research since 2017 continue to publish preliminary findings; their interpretations are debated.

[^8]: George E. Mendenhall, "Covenant Forms in Israelite Tradition," Biblical Archaeologist 17, no. 3 (1954): 50-76; Kenneth A. Kitchen and Paul J. N. Lawrence, Treaty, Law and Covenant in the Ancient Near East, 3 vols. (Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 2012); Gary Beckman, Hittite Diplomatic Texts, 2nd ed., Writings from the Ancient World 7 (Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1999). Dennis J. McCarthy, Treaty and Covenant, new ed., Analecta Biblica 21A (Rome: Biblical Institute Press, 1978), cautions that Joshua 24 lacks some treaty elements and should not be forced into the form.

[^9]: Francis Brown, S. R. Driver, and Charles A. Briggs, A Hebrew and English Lexicon of the Old Testament (Oxford: Clarendon, 1907), s.v. "מָלֵא," piel. The idiom appears of Caleb in Num. 14:24; 32:12; Deut. 1:36; Josh. 14:8, 9, 14.

[^10]: The Masoretic Text of Josh. 15:18 says Achsah urged Othniel; the Septuagint says Othniel urged her (compare Judg. 1:14). Richard D. Nelson, Joshua: A Commentary, Old Testament Library (Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 1997), on Josh. 15:18, discusses the textual problem. The ESV and NASB 2020 follow the Hebrew.

[^11]: BDB, s.v. "רָפָה." Josh. 1:5 uses the hiphil (lo arpekha, "I will not let you go"), 10:6 the hiphil with "hand" ("do not relax your hand"), and 18:3 the hitpael (mitrappim, "letting yourselves go slack").

[^12]: BDB and Ludwig Koehler and Walter Baumgartner, The Hebrew and Aramaic Lexicon of the Old Testament, trans. M. E. J. Richardson, 2 vols. (Leiden: Brill, 2001), list a separate root ברא II, piel "to cut down, clear" (Josh. 17:15, 18; Ezek. 23:47). The shared letters with ברא I, "to create," are a sound-echo for a Hebrew ear, not a proven etymological link.

[^13]: Jacob Milgrom, Numbers, JPS Torah Commentary (Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society, 1990), on Num. 27:1-11 and 36:1-13, including his discussion of ancient Near Eastern provisions for daughters' inheritance.

[^14]: Moshe Greenberg, "The Biblical Conception of Asylum," Journal of Biblical Literature 78, no. 2 (1959): 125-32, argues that the manslayer's confinement was itself a form of expiation, ended by the high priest's death. Milgrom, Numbers, on Num. 35:25-28, sees the high priest's death as expiating the blood. The Mishnah and Talmud (m. Makkot 2; b. Makkot 11b) also discuss the high priest's death; on the signs reading miklat, "refuge," at every crossroads, see b. Makkot 10b. For the Mishnah in English, Herbert Danby, trans., The Mishnah (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1933).

[^15]: The six refuge cities appear among the Levitical cities at Josh. 21:13 (Hebron), 21 (Shechem), 27 (Golan), 32 (Kedesh), 36 (Bezer), and 38 (Ramoth). Hebron was assigned specifically to the Aaronic priests.

[^16]: The eastern tribes name the altar "Witness" (Josh. 22:34). Interpreters debate whether the narrative condemns or vindicates the altar; most read it as a witness rather than a rival sanctuary, as the tribes themselves insist (22:26-29).

[^17]: On davaq as covenant language, compare Deut. 10:20; 11:22; 13:4; 30:20. Gordon J. Wenham, Genesis 1-15, Word Biblical Commentary 1 (Waco, TX: Word, 1987), on Gen. 2:24, notes the covenantal overtones of the verb.

[^18]: Howard, Joshua, on Josh. 24:19, reads Joshua's warning as a call to count the cost rather than a refusal of the people's commitment. Compare Deut. 31:27-29.

[^19]: Gen. 50:24-26; Exod. 13:19; Heb. 11:22. Acts 7:16 places Joseph's burial in a tomb "Abraham had bought," an apparent conflation of Gen. 23 and Gen. 33:19 that commentators have long discussed.

[^20]: Hess, Joshua, on Josh. 14:6-15 and 19:49-51, notes the framing of the western allotment by the two faithful spies.

[^21]: Hess, Joshua, introduction, discussing H. J. Koorevaar, De opbouw van het boek Jozua (Heverlee: Centrum voor Bijbelse Vorming België, 1990). Others, such as Nelson, Joshua, organize the book around its speeches in chaps. 1, 23, and 24.

[^22]: Jacob Milgrom, Leviticus 23-27, Anchor Bible 3B (New York: Doubleday, 2001), on Lev. 25:23.

[^23]: Milgrom, Numbers, on Num. 27:4.

[^23a]: Robert L. Hubbard Jr., The Book of Ruth, New International Commentary on the Old Testament (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1988), on Ruth 4:1-12, and Wright, God's People in God's Land, on the kinsman's duty to redeem family land.

[^24]: Peter C. Craigie, Psalms 1-50, Word Biblical Commentary 19 (Waco, TX: Word, 1983), on Ps. 16. Some interpreters suggest a Levitical author because of the "portion" language; the superscription attributes the psalm to David.

[^25]: Gerhard von Rad, "There Remains Still a Rest for the People of God: An Investigation of a Biblical Conception," in The Problem of the Hexateuch and Other Essays, trans. E. W. Trueman Dicken (Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd, 1966). Von Rad traces the "rest" theme from Deuteronomy through Joshua to Hebrews.

[^26]: See also Judg. 2:20-3:4, where the nations left in the land test Israel and teach later generations war.

[^27]: William L. Lane, Hebrews 1-8, Word Biblical Commentary 47A (Dallas: Word, 1991), on Heb. 3:7-4:13; Jon Laansma, "I Will Give You Rest": The "Rest" Motif in the New Testament with Special Reference to Mt 11 and Heb 3-4, WUNT 2/98 (Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1997).

[^28]: R. T. France, The Gospel of Mark, New International Greek Testament Commentary (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2002), on Mark 12:1-12. France reads the parable as judgment on the Jerusalem leadership. Interpreters who use Mark 12:9 to argue that the church replaces Israel must reckon with Paul's explicit denial of that conclusion in Rom. 11:1-2, 11, 29.

[^29]: Douglas J. Moo, The Letters to the Colossians and to Philemon, Pillar New Testament Commentary (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2008), on Col. 1:12. Compare the Septuagint of Deut. 10:9 and Num. 18:20.

[^30]: Walter Bauer, A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature, 3rd ed., rev. and ed. Frederick W. Danker (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000), s.v. "ἀρραβών"; Harold W. Hoehner, Ephesians: An Exegetical Commentary (Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2002), on Eph. 1:14. The Septuagint uses arrabon in Gen. 38:17-20.

[^31]: Lane, Hebrews 1-8, on Heb. 6:18-20 and 7:25.

[^32]: Douglas J. Moo, The Epistle to the Romans, New International Commentary on the New Testament (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1996), on Rom. 11:25-32; Gerald R. McDermott, ed., The New Christian Zionism: Fresh Perspectives on Israel and the Land (Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic, 2016); Michael J. Vlach, Has the Church Replaced Israel? A Theological Evaluation (Nashville: B&H Academic, 2010). For a contrasting view that reads the land promise as fulfilled in Christ, see Gary M. Burge, Jesus and the Land: The New Testament Challenge to "Holy Land" Theology (Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2010), and W. D. Davies, The Gospel and the Land (Berkeley: University of California Press, 1974).

Annotated Bibliography

Starred (★) entries are recommended first readings.

Primary Texts and Translations

• The Holy Bible, English Standard Version. Wheaton, IL: Crossway, 2001. The guide's quotation text.
• New American Standard Bible 2020. La Habra, CA: Lockman Foundation, 2020. Used for lexical comparison.
• ★ Rubin, Barry, ed. Complete Jewish Study Bible. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson; Clarksville, MD: Messianic Jewish Publishers, 2016. The ministry's anchor translation; its notes read Joshua within Israel's ongoing story.
• Danby, Herbert, trans. The Mishnah. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1933. For Makkot 2 on the cities of refuge.

Lexicons and Reference

• Bauer, Walter. A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature. 3rd ed. Revised and edited by Frederick W. Danker. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000. The standard New Testament lexicon; see arrabon and kleronomia.
• ★ Brown, Francis, S. R. Driver, and Charles A. Briggs. A Hebrew and English Lexicon of the Old Testament. Oxford: Clarendon, 1907. The ministry's primary Hebrew lexicon.
• Koehler, Ludwig, and Walter Baumgartner. The Hebrew and Aramaic Lexicon of the Old Testament. Translated by M. E. J. Richardson. 2 vols. Leiden: Brill, 2001. Fuller treatment of homonyms such as bara I and II.

Commentaries on Joshua

• ★ Hess, Richard S. Joshua: An Introduction and Commentary. Tyndale Old Testament Commentaries 6. Downers Grove, IL: InterVarsity Press, 1996. Concise, archaeologically informed, and strong on the structure of the allotment.
• ★ Howard, David M., Jr. Joshua. New American Commentary 5. Nashville: Broadman & Holman, 1998. Careful theological exposition with good discussion of covenant themes.
• Hubbard, Robert L., Jr. Joshua. NIV Application Commentary. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 2009. Bridges the text to modern application; strong on inheritance.
• Nelson, Richard D. Joshua: A Commentary. Old Testament Library. Louisville: Westminster John Knox, 1997. Critical scholarship; valuable on text-critical problems such as 15:18.
• Woudstra, Marten H. The Book of Joshua. New International Commentary on the Old Testament. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1981. Classic evangelical commentary.

Torah and Psalms Background

• Craigie, Peter C. Psalms 1-50. Word Biblical Commentary 19. Waco, TX: Word, 1983. On Psalm 16's inheritance language.
• ★ Milgrom, Jacob. Numbers. JPS Torah Commentary. Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society, 1990. Indispensable on Zelophehad's daughters, Levi's portion, and the cities of refuge.
• Milgrom, Jacob. Leviticus 23-27. Anchor Bible 3B. New York: Doubleday, 2001. The fullest treatment of Jubilee and "the land is mine."
• Sarna, Nahum M. Genesis. JPS Torah Commentary. Philadelphia: Jewish Publication Society, 1989. On Shechem, Jacob's buried idols (Gen. 35), and Joseph's bones.
• Wenham, Gordon J. Genesis 1-15. Word Biblical Commentary 1. Waco, TX: Word, 1987. On davaq in Gen. 2:24.

Ancient Near Eastern Background and Archaeology

• ★ Ben-Tor, Amnon. Hazor: Canaanite Metropolis, Israelite City. Jerusalem: Israel Exploration Society, 2016. The excavator's own synthesis; argues for an Israelite destruction.
• Beckman, Gary. Hittite Diplomatic Texts. 2nd ed. Writings from the Ancient World 7. Atlanta: Scholars Press, 1999. Primary treaty texts in translation.
• Finkelstein, Israel, ed. Shiloh: The Archaeology of a Biblical Site. Tel Aviv: Institute of Archaeology, Tel Aviv University, 1993. The major excavation report.
• ★ Kitchen, Kenneth A. On the Reliability of the Old Testament. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2003. A broad, evidence-heavy defense of the historical setting, including covenant forms.
• Kitchen, Kenneth A., and Paul J. N. Lawrence. Treaty, Law and Covenant in the Ancient Near East. 3 vols. Wiesbaden: Harrassowitz, 2012. The comprehensive collection for advanced students.
• McCarthy, Dennis J. Treaty and Covenant. New ed. Analecta Biblica 21A. Rome: Biblical Institute Press, 1978. The leading critique of over-reading the Hittite parallel.
• Mendenhall, George E. "Covenant Forms in Israelite Tradition." Biblical Archaeologist 17, no. 3 (1954): 50-76. The article that started the treaty discussion.
• Moran, William L., ed. and trans. The Amarna Letters. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1992. Primary letters naming the king of Hazor.
• Slanski, Kathryn E. The Babylonian Entitlement narûs (kudurrus): A Study in Their Form and Function. ASOR Books 9. Boston: American Schools of Oriental Research, 2003. The standard study of Babylonian land-grant monuments.
• Zuckerman, Sharon. "Anatomy of a Destruction: Crisis Architecture, Termination Rituals and the Fall of Canaanite Hazor." Journal of Mediterranean Archaeology 20, no. 1 (2007): 3-32. The main alternative to Ben-Tor's reading.

Land, Inheritance, and Rest

• Brueggemann, Walter. The Land: Place as Gift, Promise, and Challenge in Biblical Faith. 2nd ed. Minneapolis: Fortress, 2002. Land as gift and temptation; read critically.
• Hubbard, Robert L., Jr. The Book of Ruth. New International Commentary on the Old Testament. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1988. The standard treatment of the go'el and the redemption of Elimelech's land.
• Greenberg, Moshe. "The Biblical Conception of Asylum." Journal of Biblical Literature 78, no. 2 (1959): 125-32. Short and foundational on the cities of refuge.
• Laansma, Jon. "I Will Give You Rest": The "Rest" Motif in the New Testament with Special Reference to Mt 11 and Heb 3-4. WUNT 2/98. Tübingen: Mohr Siebeck, 1997. Advanced study of rest from Joshua to Hebrews.
• von Rad, Gerhard. "There Remains Still a Rest for the People of God: An Investigation of a Biblical Conception." In The Problem of the Hexateuch and Other Essays, translated by E. W. Trueman Dicken. Edinburgh: Oliver & Boyd, 1966. The classic essay on rest.
• ★ Wright, Christopher J. H. God's People in God's Land: Family, Land, and Property in the Old Testament. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1990. The best single book on nachalah and stewardship.

Worldview, Conquest, and Theology

• ★ Heiser, Michael S. The Unseen Realm: Recovering the Supernatural Worldview of the Bible. Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press, 2015. Reads the Anakim and the conquest within the Bible's supernatural worldview.
• Walton, John H. Ancient Near Eastern Thought and the Old Testament. 2nd ed. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2018. Background on land, temple, and covenant.
• Walton, John H., and J. Harvey Walton. The Lost World of the Israelite Conquest. Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic, 2017. A provocative reading of the conquest; useful for the Leader's Notes discussion, though its conclusions are debated.

New Testament Fulfillment

• France, R. T. The Gospel of Mark. New International Greek Testament Commentary. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2002. On the parable of the tenants.
• Hoehner, Harold W. Ephesians: An Exegetical Commentary. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2002. On the Spirit as arrabon and the Gentiles as fellow heirs.
• ★ Lane, William L. Hebrews 1-8. Word Biblical Commentary 47A. Dallas: Word, 1991. Essential on the rest that remains and the refuge of the hope set before us.
• Moo, Douglas J. The Letters to the Colossians and to Philemon. Pillar New Testament Commentary. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2008. On "the inheritance of the saints in light."

Israel and the Church (Romans 9-11)

• Burge, Gary M. Jesus and the Land: The New Testament Challenge to "Holy Land" Theology. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2010. A contrasting view; read alongside McDermott.
• Davies, W. D. The Gospel and the Land: Early Christianity and Jewish Territorial Doctrine. Berkeley: University of California Press, 1974. A classic scholarly survey.
• McDermott, Gerald R., ed. The New Christian Zionism: Fresh Perspectives on Israel and the Land. Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic, 2016. Scholarly defense of Israel's ongoing covenant and land.
• ★ Moo, Douglas J. The Epistle to the Romans. New International Commentary on the New Testament. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 1996. On the irrevocable calling of Israel.
• Vlach, Michael J. Has the Church Replaced Israel? A Theological Evaluation. Nashville: B&H Academic, 2010. A clear critique of replacement theology.

Watch every episode of this study, and subscribe with the bell: https://www.youtube.com/@DrShawnMichaelGreener

Full archive and resources: https://www.truewordfaithforlife.com

Unless otherwise noted, Scripture quotations are from the ESV® Bible (The Holy Bible, English Standard Version®), © 2001 by Crossway, a publishing ministry of Good News Publishers. Used by permission. All rights reserved.

© 2026 Dr. Shawn M. Greener. All Rights Reserved. Free to copy and share in full, unedited, for non-commercial teaching, with this notice intact.