Are Biblical Miracles Logical?

Are Biblical Miracles Logical?

Biblical miracles are not ancient fairytales for primitive minds, but purposeful signs of divine sovereignty inside the real world God created, governs, judges, and redeems.

Are biblical miracles ancient fairytales, or has the modern world been trained to sneer before it studies?

That question matters because many people do not reject the Bible after careful reading. They reject a caricature of the Bible they inherited from a culture that often confuses mockery with intelligence.

They hear about the Red Sea and assume myth.

They hear about Jericho and assume folklore.

They hear about manna and assume exaggeration.

They hear about the resurrection of Yeshua and assume religious wishful thinking.

But here is the problem.

That reaction is often not the result of careful historical reasoning. It is often the result of modern chronological arrogance, the assumption that newer people are automatically wiser people, and that ancient people believed miracles because they were too primitive to know better.

But the Bible itself does not portray ancient people as gullible children.

Abraham questions.

Sarah laughs.

Moses argues.

Gideon hesitates.

Zechariah doubts.

Thomas demands evidence.

The disciples are terrified when Yeshua walks on the water.

The women at the tomb are shocked.

The resurrection is not treated like a predictable religious mood. It breaks into grief, fear, confusion, and disbelief.

That matters.

The Bible’s own witnesses knew the difference between normal and extraordinary. They knew seas do not usually part. They knew fortified walls do not usually fall because priests march around them. They knew barren women do not usually conceive. They knew dead men do not usually rise.

The extraordinary is extraordinary because the ordinary is understood.

So the issue is not whether ancient people understood normal life. They did.

The issue is whether the living God, the Creator of heaven and earth, can act within His own creation.

That is where the conversation changes.

A miracle is not a logical impossibility if God exists. If the world is a closed machine with no Creator, then miracles are excluded before the evidence is even considered. But if creation belongs to God, if creation is upheld by God, if the world is not autonomous but contingent, then God is not trespassing when He acts in His own world.

He is the King acting inside His own kingdom.

That does not mean every miracle claim should be believed automatically. It does not mean we turn off discernment. It does not mean every emotional story, internet claim, or exaggerated testimony should be accepted without careful judgment.

Biblical faith is not intellectual laziness.

The better question is not, “Can God act?”

The better question is, “Did God act here, and what does the act mean?”

That is the logic of biblical miracles.

They are not random magic tricks. They are not divine entertainment. They are not supernatural fireworks. They happen at covenantal turning points. They judge evil. They deliver the oppressed. They expose false gods. They confirm calling. They preserve promise. They reveal the identity of the Messiah. They announce new creation.

The Red Sea is not merely about water moving.

It is about ownership.

Pharaoh claims Israel. Yahweh calls Israel His son. Pharaoh enslaves. Yahweh redeems. Pharaoh uses water as an instrument of death against Hebrew babies. Yahweh uses water as the path of deliverance and the instrument of judgment against Egypt’s military power.

In the Ancient Near Eastern world, Pharaoh was not merely a government official. Egyptian royal ideology connected Pharaoh with divine order, cosmic stability, and the gods of Egypt. So when Yahweh confronts Pharaoh, He is not simply negotiating improved working conditions for Israel. He is confronting an empire’s false theology.

The Nile is not sovereign.

The throne is not sovereign.

Egypt’s gods are not sovereign.

The slave economy is not sovereign.

Yahweh is sovereign.

That is not random. That is coherent covenant confrontation.

Jericho is the same kind of issue.

If you rip Jericho out of the story, it sounds strange. March around a city. Carry the ark. Blow trumpets. Wait in silence. Shout. Walls fall.

But inside the covenant story, Jericho is not a magic trick. Israel is entering the land promised to Abraham’s descendants. The first great city does not fall because Israel proves its military genius. It falls through obedient dependence.

Priests.

Ark.

Trumpets.

Silence.

Waiting.

Then shout.

The point is theological and formative. The land is gift, not trophy. Promise, not plunder. Covenant, not conquest for human ego.

The miracle teaches Israel that victory belongs to God before it belongs to them.

This is why we must stop reading Bible miracles as isolated episodes. When we fragment the Bible, miracles feel random. A flood over here. A burning bush over there. A sea splitting. A wall falling. Bread from heaven. Fire from heaven. A virgin conceiving. A tomb opening.

But when we walk the story in order, the pieces begin to connect.

Creation connects to covenant.

Covenant connects to Exodus.

Exodus connects to Torah.

Torah connects to land.

Land connects to kingship.

Kingship connects to exile.

Exile connects to restoration hope.

Restoration hope connects to Messiah.

Messiah connects to resurrection.

Resurrection connects to new creation.

Suddenly the miraculous does not become less extraordinary. It becomes more coherent.

That is why the resurrection of Yeshua stands at the center.

The resurrection is not a vague religious symbol. It is not merely the disciples feeling inspired after tragedy. The earliest Christian proclamation was not, “His ideas live on.” It was, “God raised Him from the dead.”

That claim entered history.

Yeshua was publicly crucified. He was buried. His followers were shattered. Then they proclaimed His resurrection in the world where He had been executed.

The Gospel accounts do not portray the disciples as heroic believers waiting confidently outside the tomb. They are confused, frightened, slow, and resistant. Thomas wants evidence. The first witnesses of the empty tomb are women, which is not the most convenient invented testimony in that cultural setting if the goal were easy persuasion.

You can reject the resurrection claim. People have. People do.

But do not call it intellectually unserious without doing the work.

Historical events are not studied the same way repeatable laboratory events are studied. You cannot put the crossing of the Rubicon in a laboratory. You cannot rerun the fall of Jerusalem under controlled conditions. You cannot repeat the assassination of Abraham Lincoln as an experiment.

History works through testimony, documents, context, corroboration, coherence, explanatory power, and the credibility of witnesses.

So when someone says, “You cannot scientifically prove the resurrection,” the answer is, “Of course not, if by scientifically you mean repeatable laboratory testing. That is the wrong category.”

The question is historical.

What did the witnesses claim?

Where did they say it happened?

What did it cost them?

Does the claim fit the larger story?

Does it explain the birth and survival of the movement?

Does it account for the transformation of the disciples?

Does it cohere with the Bible’s covenant logic?

Does it reveal the character and purpose of God?

That does not remove faith.

It purifies the question.

Faith is not pretending evidence does not matter. Faith is trust in the God who has revealed Himself, acted in history, and called for allegiance.

This also matters for real life.

Because your view of miracles shapes your view of reality.

If the world is closed, then visible circumstances are ultimate.

The diagnosis is ultimate.

The addiction is ultimate.

The grief is ultimate.

The algorithm is ultimate.

The economy is ultimate.

The empire is ultimate.

The grave is ultimate.

But if the Creator reigns, then visible circumstances are real, but they are not ultimate.

The Red Sea is real.

But it is not ultimate.

Jericho’s walls are real.

But they are not ultimate.

Rome’s cross is real.

But it is not ultimate.

The sealed tomb is real.

But it is not ultimate.

God does not ask you to deny reality.

He teaches you to stop worshiping the part of reality you can see.

That is why biblical miracles are not childish distractions from real life. They are pillars for real life.

The Red Sea teaches you that what traps you is not more sovereign than the God who called you forward.

Jericho teaches you that obedience may look foolish before it looks fruitful.

Manna teaches you that daily dependence is not weakness. It is training.

The wilderness teaches you that getting Israel out of Egypt is not the same thing as getting Egypt out of Israel.

The incarnation teaches you that God does not save from a distance.

The cross teaches you that God’s victory may look like defeat before resurrection reveals the truth.

The empty tomb teaches you that death is not the final authority.

So yes, biblical miracles are logical.

Not logical if you begin with a closed universe and refuse to let the evidence speak.

Not logical if you assume the Bible is guilty before trial.

Not logical if you call sarcasm scholarship.

But logical if the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob is Creator.

Logical if creation belongs to Him.

Logical if covenant matters.

Logical if evil must be judged.

Logical if the oppressed must be delivered.

Logical if promise must be preserved.

Logical if Yeshua is not merely a teacher, but Lord.

To the skeptic, you are welcome here.

Bring your questions.

Bring your doubts.

Bring your objections.

But bring better skepticism.

Not lazy dismissal.

Not inherited contempt.

Not the tired assumption that ancient people believed miracles because they were primitive.

Read the text.

Study the world behind it.

Ask what the authors are actually claiming.

Ask why the miracles happen where they happen.

Ask whether the testimony has the marks of invention or the marks of costly witness.

And ask one more question:

What am I afraid would be true if the Bible is right?

To the believer, stop being embarrassed by the Bible.

But also stop defending it badly.

Do not use fake evidence.

Do not spread internet archaeology without checking it.

Do not turn every headline into prophecy panic.

Do not confuse emotional volume with spiritual authority.

Do not exaggerate because you think God needs help.

Truth does not need our tricks.

The Bible is strong enough for careful handling.

Read it in context.

Study the ancient world.

Know the difference between poetry and narrative, symbol and event, theology and fantasy, testimony and manipulation.

That is not weak faith.

That is rooted confidence.

Biblical miracles are not ancient fairytales.

They are windows into the reign of God.

They show creation responding to its Creator.

They show empires exposed.

They show slaves delivered.

They show walls falling.

They show the dead raised.

They show the King is not absent.

He is ruling.

He is speaking.

He is calling.

And if the resurrection is true, neutrality is over.

Yeshua is not merely inspiring.

He is Lord.

So do not choose sarcasm over study.

Do not choose distance over discipleship.

Do not choose comfort over truth.

Choose the Way.

Choose truth.

Choose the King.

Shalom b’Shem Yeshua.

Shalom Aleikum.

© 2026 Dr. Shawn M. Greener. All Rights Reserved.

True Word, Faith for LIFE!

BLOG FOOTNOTES

1. Craig S. Keener, Miracles: The Credibility of the New Testament Accounts, 2 vols. (Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2011), especially the introduction and methodological sections. Keener’s work is significant because it challenges the assumption that miracle claims are confined to premodern or uncritical cultures.

2. John H. Walton, Ancient Near Eastern Thought and the Old Testament: Introducing the Conceptual World of the Hebrew Bible, 2nd ed. (Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2018). Walton is useful here because he warns modern readers against imposing modern categories onto ancient texts without understanding the ancient conceptual world.

3. K. A. Kitchen, On the Reliability of the Old Testament (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2006). Kitchen’s work is especially useful for students engaging the historical claims and cultural settings of the Hebrew Bible.

4. James K. Hoffmeier, Israel in Egypt: The Evidence for the Authenticity of the Exodus Tradition (New York: Oxford University Press, 1997). Hoffmeier gives sustained attention to the Egyptian background of the Exodus traditions.

5. Richard Bauckham, Jesus and the Eyewitnesses: The Gospels as Eyewitness Testimony, 2nd ed. (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2017). Bauckham argues that the Gospels should be read with serious attention to eyewitness testimony and named witnesses.

6. Michael R. Licona, The Resurrection of Jesus: A New Historiographical Approach (Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic, 2010). Licona is useful for distinguishing historical method from laboratory science when assessing resurrection claims.

7. N. T. Wright, The Resurrection of the Son of God (Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2003). Wright situates resurrection belief within Second Temple Jewish expectation and early Christian proclamation.

8. David Hume, An Enquiry concerning Human Understanding, ed. Tom L. Beauchamp (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999), section 10, “Of Miracles.” Hume remains essential because many modern objections to miracles still depend on assumptions similar to his argument from testimony and probability.

9. C. S. Lewis, Miracles: A Preliminary Study (New York: HarperOne, 2001). Lewis remains useful for the philosophical issue of whether naturalism can be assumed before the miracle question is examined.

10. Exodus 14; Joshua 6; John 20; 1 Corinthians 15. These primary texts are central to the blog’s examples of deliverance, covenant victory, resurrection witness, and apostolic proclamation.

The Bible Rebinder I Mentioned on the Podcast

This is one of the three Bibles Melissa of MooseWorks Bible restored for me, beautifully rebound with a rugged new cover and exceptional attention to detail.

A Bible is more than a book. It is often a treasury of prayers, notes, promises, memories, and the record of a life spent seeking God.

If you have a treasured Bible that deserves to be preserved with excellence, I am honored to recommend Melissa of MooseWorks Bible.

Her work is marked by beautiful craftsmanship, thoughtful detail, and genuine kindness. She does not simply repair Bibles. She helps preserve the story they carry.

Click Link Below to contact MooseWorks Bibles

Contact Mooseworks Bibles TODAY!

© 2026 Dr. Shawn M. Greener. All Rights Reserved.

True Word, Faith for LIFE!

STUDY GUIDE

Are Biblical Miracles Logical?

Focus Keyphrase: Biblical Miracles

Primary Question: Are biblical miracles ancient myths, or serious claims rooted in history, testimony, covenant, and divine sovereignty?

Summary

This study guide accompanies the special episode “Are Biblical Miracles Logical?” The central claim is simple but deeply consequential: biblical miracles are not random supernatural stunts or ancient fairy tales. They are purposeful acts of the Creator King inside His own creation, usually occurring at decisive covenant moments.

The modern world often assumes that intelligent people must dismiss miracles as primitive superstition. But that assumption frequently depends on chronological arrogance, not careful scholarship. Ancient people were not stupid because they were ancient. They knew the difference between ordinary and extraordinary. The Bible itself repeatedly presents people doubting, fearing, questioning, resisting, and being shocked by the miraculous.

A serious reading of biblical miracles must ask more than, “How could this happen?” It must also ask, “Why did this happen here?” “What covenant issue is at stake?” “What false power is being confronted?” “What promise is being preserved?” “What does this reveal about God?” “How does this point toward Yeshua?”

The Red Sea is not merely water moving. It is Yahweh confronting Pharaoh’s false claim of ownership over Israel. Jericho is not merely walls collapsing. It is Yahweh teaching Israel that the land is gift, not trophy. The resurrection is not merely an inspiring religious idea. It is God’s vindication of Yeshua, the defeat of death, and the launching of new creation in history.

This study guide is written for believers, skeptics, atheists, doubters, and those on the fence. It does not ask anyone to pretend hard questions are not hard. It asks every reader to bring better skepticism, better faith, better historical reasoning, and better humility before the God who may have acted more coherently, more publicly, and more powerfully than the modern world taught us to expect.

Key Terms

Miracle: In biblical theology, a miracle is not merely an unusual event. It is a purposeful act of God that reveals His authority, character, covenant faithfulness, judgment, mercy, or redemptive purpose. Philosophically, miracle discussions often center on events not explainable by natural causes alone, but biblical miracle narratives must also be interpreted within covenant context.1

Covenant: A binding relational commitment structured by loyalty, promise, obligation, blessing, and consequence. Biblical miracles often occur when covenant identity, covenant promise, or covenant allegiance is being contested.2

Divine Sovereignty: God’s rightful rule over creation, history, nations, powers, and human life. Miracles are not God trespassing in creation. They are the Creator acting within the world He made and sustains.3

Primitive Bias: The modern assumption that ancient people were less rational, less observant, or more gullible simply because they lived before the modern technological age. This bias often prevents modern readers from taking ancient testimony seriously.

Ancient Near Eastern Context: The cultural, political, religious, legal, and literary world surrounding the Hebrew Bible. Understanding ANE context helps readers see why events like the plagues, the Red Sea, and Jericho are not random spectacles, but covenant confrontations in a world of competing divine claims.4

Eyewitness Testimony: Testimony rooted in firsthand experience or the preserved memory of those close to the events. In New Testament studies, eyewitness testimony is central to discussions of Gospel reliability and resurrection claims.5

Historical Reasoning: The method by which nonrepeatable past events are investigated through testimony, documents, context, coherence, corroboration, explanatory power, and witness credibility. Historical claims are not tested the same way repeatable laboratory events are tested.6

Resurrection: In biblical and Second Temple Jewish context, resurrection is not merely survival of the soul or symbolic inspiration. The New Testament claim is that God raised Yeshua bodily from the dead, vindicating Him as Messiah and Lord.7

Context and Exegesis

1. Primitive Bias and the Modern Sneer

The episode opens with a direct challenge: the modern world did not necessarily reason its way out of biblical miracles. It was trained to sneer at them.

This matters because many modern people approach the Bible with a verdict already in hand. They assume that ancient people believed miracles because they were primitive. But the Bible does not support that caricature.

Abraham does not immediately understand how the promise will be fulfilled.

Sarah laughs at the idea of bearing a son in old age.

Moses argues with God at the burning bush.

Gideon asks for confirmation.

Zechariah doubts the angelic announcement.

Thomas refuses to believe without evidence.

The disciples do not behave like people who expect resurrection as the obvious outcome after crucifixion.

In other words, biblical people knew the difference between ordinary life and extraordinary divine action. The miracles shocked them precisely because they understood normal patterns.

Study Note: This is one of the most important apologetic corrections. The question is not whether ancient people were capable of recognizing extraordinary claims. They were. The question is whether the testimony, context, and covenant logic of those claims deserve serious consideration.

2. The Red Sea as Covenant Confrontation

The Red Sea event is often reduced to a debate over mechanism. Did the water literally stand? Was there a natural wind event? Was the location different than traditionally imagined? Those questions can have value, but they are not the first question the narrative presses.

The Exodus narrative presents Yahweh confronting Pharaoh’s claim over Israel. Pharaoh enslaves. Yahweh redeems. Pharaoh uses water against Hebrew babies. Yahweh uses water as the pathway of Israel’s deliverance and the judgment of Egypt’s military strength.

In ANE context, Pharaoh’s power was not merely political. Egyptian kingship was religiously charged. Pharaoh’s authority was bound up with divine order, national stability, and the gods of Egypt. That means the Exodus is not merely a labor dispute.

It is a theological confrontation.

The Red Sea answers the question: Who owns Israel?

The answer is: Yahweh.

It also answers another question: Who rules creation?

The answer is: Yahweh.

This is why the miracle has logic. It occurs at the exact point where divine ownership, covenant promise, empire, slavery, and false sovereignty collide.

3. Jericho as Obedient Dependence

Jericho is also easy to mock if read in isolation. Marching, silence, trumpets, priests, ark, shout, collapse. To a modern reader detached from the covenant story, it can sound irrational.

But Jericho is Israel’s first major sign of entry into the promised land. The city’s fall is structured around worship, obedience, and divine presence rather than conventional siege strategy.

The ark matters.

The priests matter.

The trumpets matter.

The waiting matters.

The silence matters.

The shout matters.

The point is not that Israel possesses secret military genius. The point is that the land is gift, not trophy. Yahweh is forming His people before He settles His people.

Jericho teaches that obedience may look foolish before it looks fruitful.

4. The Resurrection as Historical Claim

The resurrection of Yeshua is the central miracle claim of the Christian faith. Paul states plainly in 1 Corinthians 15 that if Messiah has not been raised, Christian preaching and faith are empty.

This makes Christianity unusually vulnerable to historical scrutiny. The apostles did not merely preach timeless ethical principles. They proclaimed that God acted in history by raising Yeshua from the dead.

The resurrection claim is not properly tested by repeatable laboratory experiment because it is a one time historical event. That does not make it irrational. It means it must be investigated by historical reasoning.

Historical reasoning asks:

What did the earliest witnesses claim?

How early is the testimony?

Where was it proclaimed?

What did it cost the witnesses?

Does the claim explain the transformation of the disciples?

Does it account for the rise of the early movement?

How do alternative explanations compare?

The Gospels portray the disciples with remarkable honesty. They are fearful, confused, slow to believe, and often unimpressive. The inclusion of women as first witnesses to the empty tomb is also significant because it does not read like the easiest apologetic invention in the first century.8

This does not force belief. But it does demand more serious engagement than lazy dismissal.

5. Faith, Evidence, and Intellectual Integrity

Biblical faith is not pretending hard questions are not hard.

Faith can ask questions.

Faith can study evidence.

Faith can wrestle.

Faith can say, “Lord, I believe. Help my unbelief.”

But there is a difference between honest wrestling and cynical dismissal.

Honest wrestling says, “I want to understand.”

Cynical dismissal says, “I already decided this is embarrassing.”

The believer must also be careful. A strong defense of the Bible must not rely on weak arguments, fake evidence, exaggerated claims, or internet sensationalism. Truth does not need our tricks. The Bible is strong enough for careful handling.

Major Bible Passages for Study

Exodus 14: Yahweh delivers Israel through the sea and judges Egypt’s military power.

Joshua 6: Jericho falls through obedient dependence centered on Yahweh’s presence.

1 Kings 18: Elijah confronts Baal worship on Mount Carmel, exposing false worship and calling Israel back to Yahweh.

Isaiah 7:14 and Matthew 1:18 to 25: The virgin conception must be read within promise, fulfillment, and messianic identity.

John 11: Yeshua raises Lazarus, revealing Himself as the resurrection and the life.

John 20: Thomas moves from demanded evidence to confession, “My Lord and my God.”

1 Corinthians 15: Paul presents resurrection as central, public, witnessed, and indispensable to Christian faith.

Discussion Questions

1. Which biblical miracle have you struggled with most, and why?

2. Have you ever dismissed a biblical miracle because you assumed ancient people were more gullible than modern people?

3. What is the difference between honest skepticism and inherited contempt?

4. Why is it important to ask not only “How could this happen?” but “Why did God act here?”

5. How does the Red Sea miracle confront Pharaoh’s political and religious claims?

6. What does Jericho teach Israel about obedience, dependence, and the promised land?

7. Why is the resurrection of Yeshua different from a vague religious symbol?

8. Why should historical claims be investigated differently than repeatable laboratory experiments?

9. What weak arguments have Christians sometimes used when defending miracles?

10. What would have to change in your life if the resurrection of Yeshua is true?

Practical Application

1. Study one miracle in context this week.

Do not isolate it. Read the chapters before and after. Ask what covenant issue is at stake.

2. Ask better questions.

Instead of only asking, “How did this happen?” ask, “What does this reveal about God?”

3. Reject lazy skepticism.

Do not confuse sarcasm with scholarship. If you reject a biblical claim, make sure you have actually studied it.

4. Reject shallow apologetics.

Do not share claims you have not checked. God does not need exaggeration.

5. Let the miracles form courage.

If God rules creation, then visible circumstances are real, but they are not ultimate.

6. Center everything on Yeshua.

Every biblical miracle must be understood in light of the God who reveals Himself finally and fully in the crucified and risen Messiah.

Study Guide Footnotes

1. For a philosophical overview of miracle definitions and classic debates, see David Corner, “Miracles,” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, substantive revision, 2021. Corner notes that miracle discussions often begin with the idea of an event not explainable by natural causes alone. For the classic skeptical argument, see David Hume, An Enquiry concerning Human Understanding, ed. Tom L. Beauchamp (Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999), section 10.

2. For covenant as a structuring category in the Hebrew Bible, see Walter C. Kaiser Jr., Toward an Old Testament Theology (Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1978); Peter J. Gentry and Stephen J. Wellum, Kingdom through Covenant: A Biblical Theological Understanding of the Covenants, 2nd ed. (Wheaton, IL: Crossway, 2018); and Michael S. Heiser, The Unseen Realm: Recovering the Supernatural Worldview of the Bible (Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press, 2015).

3. C. S. Lewis, Miracles: A Preliminary Study (New York: HarperOne, 2001), especially the early chapters dealing with naturalism and supernaturalism. Lewis is helpful because he exposes the problem of assuming naturalism before examining miracle claims.

4. John H. Walton, Ancient Near Eastern Thought and the Old Testament: Introducing the Conceptual World of the Hebrew Bible, 2nd ed. (Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2018); John H. Walton and J. Harvey Walton, The Lost World of the Torah: Law as Covenant and Wisdom in Ancient Context (Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic, 2019). Walton’s work is important for resisting modern category errors when interpreting ancient biblical texts.

5. Richard Bauckham, Jesus and the Eyewitnesses: The Gospels as Eyewitness Testimony, 2nd ed. (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2017). Bauckham’s work is especially relevant to the Gospel witness and the named persons in the Jesus tradition.

6. Michael R. Licona, The Resurrection of Jesus: A New Historiographical Approach (Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic, 2010). Licona’s method is helpful for distinguishing historical inquiry from laboratory science.

7. N. T. Wright, The Resurrection of the Son of God (Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2003). Wright is essential for understanding resurrection within Second Temple Jewish categories rather than modern generic spirituality.

8. See Bauckham, Jesus and the Eyewitnesses; Wright, Resurrection of the Son of God; and Licona, Resurrection of Jesus. On women as first witnesses and the apologetic significance of this tradition, see also Craig S. Keener, The Historical Jesus of the Gospels (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2009), 331 to 347.

9. Craig S. Keener, Miracles: The Credibility of the New Testament Accounts, 2 vols. (Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2011). Keener’s work is especially useful because he challenges simplistic claims that miracle testimony is only plausible in premodern or isolated contexts.

10. K. A. Kitchen, On the Reliability of the Old Testament (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2006). Kitchen provides a detailed historical defense of many Old Testament settings and claims.

11. James K. Hoffmeier, Israel in Egypt: The Evidence for the Authenticity of the Exodus Tradition (New York: Oxford University Press, 1997); James K. Hoffmeier, Ancient Israel in Sinai: The Evidence for the Authenticity of the Wilderness Tradition (New York: Oxford University Press, 2005). Hoffmeier’s work is especially relevant to Exodus and wilderness traditions.

12. Joshua Berman, Created Equal: How the Bible Broke with Ancient Political Thought (New York: Oxford University Press, 2008). Berman is useful for showing how the Hebrew Bible differs from surrounding ancient political thought.

13. Tremper Longman III and John H. Walton, The Lost World of the Flood: Mythology, Theology, and the Deluge Debate (Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic, 2018). This work is useful for interpreting early Genesis with attention to ancient genre and theological purpose.

14. Kenneth A. Mathews, Genesis 11:27 to 50:26, New American Commentary 1B (Nashville: Broadman and Holman, 2005). Mathews is useful for covenant and patriarchal context.

15. Douglas K. Stuart, Exodus, New American Commentary 2 (Nashville: Broadman and Holman, 2006). Stuart provides exegetical grounding for Exodus and Yahweh’s confrontation with Egypt.

16. Richard S. Hess, Joshua: An Introduction and Commentary, Tyndale Old Testament Commentaries (Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic, 1996). Hess is useful for Joshua, Jericho, and covenantal entry into the land.

17. Craig A. Evans, Fabricating Jesus: How Modern Scholars Distort the Gospels (Downers Grove, IL: IVP Books, 2006). Evans addresses skeptical reconstructions of the Gospel accounts.

18. Larry W. Hurtado, Lord Jesus Christ: Devotion to Jesus in Earliest Christianity (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2003). Hurtado’s work is valuable for early devotion to Yeshua and the rapid emergence of high Christology.

19. Martin Hengel, Crucifixion in the Ancient World and the Folly of the Message of the Cross (Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1977). Hengel remains important for understanding the shame and terror of crucifixion in the Roman world.

20. Gary R. Habermas and Michael R. Licona, The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus (Grand Rapids: Kregel, 2004). This work presents a more accessible version of resurrection apologetics.

21. William Lane Craig, Reasonable Faith: Christian Truth and Apologetics, 3rd ed. (Wheaton, IL: Crossway, 2008). Craig gives a broad apologetic framework including miracle and resurrection arguments.

22. Alvin Plantinga, Warranted Christian Belief (New York: Oxford University Press, 2000). Plantinga is useful for epistemology and the rationality of Christian belief.

23. John Earman, Hume’s Abject Failure: The Argument against Miracles (New York: Oxford University Press, 2000). Earman, though not writing as a conservative apologist, sharply critiques Hume’s famous argument against miracles.

24. Colin J. Humphreys, The Miracles of Exodus: A Scientist’s Discovery of the Extraordinary Natural Causes of the Biblical Stories (San Francisco: HarperSanFrancisco, 2003). Humphreys is useful for discussions of natural mechanism, though readers should distinguish mechanism proposals from theological meaning.

25. The Complete Jewish Study Bible, ed. Rabbi Barry Rubin (Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 2016). This study Bible is helpful for Jewish background, terminology, and Messianic reading connections.

Study Guide Bibliography

Bauckham, Richard. Jesus and the Eyewitnesses: The Gospels as Eyewitness Testimony. 2nd ed. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2017.

Berman, Joshua. Created Equal: How the Bible Broke with Ancient Political Thought. New York: Oxford University Press, 2008.

Corner, David. “Miracles.” Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Substantive revision, 2021.

Craig, William Lane. Reasonable Faith: Christian Truth and Apologetics. 3rd ed. Wheaton, IL: Crossway, 2008.

Earman, John. Hume’s Abject Failure: The Argument against Miracles. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.

Evans, Craig A. Fabricating Jesus: How Modern Scholars Distort the Gospels. Downers Grove, IL: IVP Books, 2006.

Gentry, Peter J., and Stephen J. Wellum. Kingdom through Covenant: A Biblical Theological Understanding of the Covenants. 2nd ed. Wheaton, IL: Crossway, 2018.

Habermas, Gary R., and Michael R. Licona. The Case for the Resurrection of Jesus. Grand Rapids: Kregel, 2004.

Heiser, Michael S. The Unseen Realm: Recovering the Supernatural Worldview of the Bible. Bellingham, WA: Lexham Press, 2015.

Hengel, Martin. Crucifixion in the Ancient World and the Folly of the Message of the Cross. Philadelphia: Fortress Press, 1977.

Hess, Richard S. Joshua: An Introduction and Commentary. Tyndale Old Testament Commentaries. Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic, 1996.

Hoffmeier, James K. Ancient Israel in Sinai: The Evidence for the Authenticity of the Wilderness Tradition. New York: Oxford University Press, 2005.

Hoffmeier, James K. Israel in Egypt: The Evidence for the Authenticity of the Exodus Tradition. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997.

Hume, David. An Enquiry concerning Human Understanding. Edited by Tom L. Beauchamp. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.

Humphreys, Colin J. The Miracles of Exodus: A Scientist’s Discovery of the Extraordinary Natural Causes of the Biblical Stories. San Francisco: HarperSanFrancisco, 2003.

Hurtado, Larry W. Lord Jesus Christ: Devotion to Jesus in Earliest Christianity. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2003.

Kaiser, Walter C., Jr. Toward an Old Testament Theology. Grand Rapids: Zondervan, 1978.

Keener, Craig S. The Historical Jesus of the Gospels. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2009.

Keener, Craig S. Miracles: The Credibility of the New Testament Accounts. 2 vols. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2011.

Kitchen, K. A. On the Reliability of the Old Testament. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2006.

Lewis, C. S. Miracles: A Preliminary Study. New York: HarperOne, 2001.

Licona, Michael R. The Resurrection of Jesus: A New Historiographical Approach. Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic, 2010.

Longman, Tremper III, and John H. Walton. The Lost World of the Flood: Mythology, Theology, and the Deluge Debate. Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic, 2018.

Mathews, Kenneth A. Genesis 11:27 to 50:26. New American Commentary 1B. Nashville: Broadman and Holman, 2005.

Plantinga, Alvin. Warranted Christian Belief. New York: Oxford University Press, 2000.

Rubin, Barry, ed. The Complete Jewish Study Bible. Peabody, MA: Hendrickson, 2016.

Stuart, Douglas K. Exodus. New American Commentary 2. Nashville: Broadman and Holman, 2006.

Walton, John H. Ancient Near Eastern Thought and the Old Testament: Introducing the Conceptual World of the Hebrew Bible. 2nd ed. Grand Rapids: Baker Academic, 2018.

Walton, John H., and J. Harvey Walton. The Lost World of the Torah: Law as Covenant and Wisdom in Ancient Context. Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic, 2019.

Wright, N. T. The Resurrection of the Son of God. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 2003.

Shalom b’Shem Yeshua.

Shalom Aleikum.

© 2026 Dr. Shawn M. Greener. All Rights Reserved.

True Word, Faith for LIFE!

#BiblicalMiracles

#ChristianApologetics

#BibleTeaching

biblical miracles, Christian apologetics, Bible evidence