WHEN THE POISON CAME HOME

Christian Antisemitism: When the Poison Came Home

Confronting the oldest hatred, recovering the root

Romans 9 through 11 | Genesis 12:3

The oldest hatred learned to quote your Bible. Too many of us went quiet when it started wearing our colors. Not this time.

WHEN THE POISON CAME HOME
Live, 7:00 PM Eastern.
https://www.youtube.com/live/mi72EwMiP9g?si=RiKu3GFzt4NJjYNa

#Antisemitism #Israel #Yeshua

Before anything else, understand what this is not. This is not an argument against asking hard questions. Question Israeli policy. Question governments and military decisions. Question the conduct of any prime minister, and question politicians on the left and the right with equal nerve. All of that is fair, and Christians of all people should be able to do it without flinching. But there is a line where honest criticism of a government curls into contempt for a people, and that line is being crossed again in our time. The argument of this piece is narrow and specific: Christians have a biblical reason to recognize that line before anyone else does, and a biblical obligation to refuse to cross it.

The oldest hatred on earth did not disappear. It changed clothes. Today it travels through algorithms and conspiracy theories, through Holocaust jokes and political tribes, and, most shamefully, through Christian language itself. What follows confronts antisemitism without political tribalism. It tries to distinguish legitimate criticism of Israel from hatred of Jews, examines October 7 and the Holocaust against primary and authoritative sources, and returns finally to the place Christians cannot outsource to politics: Romans 9 through 11, where Paul leaves the Gentile believer with a warning that should make Christian antisemitism impossible. You do not support the root. The root supports you.

The Half-Second Before We Reject It

There is a moment that frightens me more than the antisemitic meme itself. It is the half-second before we reject it.

Picture it. You are scrolling late at night, the house quiet, and someone you respect appears on your screen. Maybe he calls himself conservative, or Christian, or patriotic. Maybe he quotes the same Bible you quote and fears many of the same things you fear. Then comes the joke about the Jews. Not a serious argument about borders or settlements or civilian casualties, the things that can and should be debated honestly, but something older. A wink about who really owns the banks. A sneer about who controls the media. A knowing reference to "globalists." A claim that the Jews are not really Jews. A joke about ovens. And beneath it, people who would recoil from a racial slur aimed at almost anyone else are laughing. Then the frightening thing happens. For half a second, some angry, wounded, exhausted part of us almost nods along.

That is how poison gets into a house. It rarely arrives with a skull and crossbones on the bottle. It comes labeled as truth they don't want you to know. It comes as humor, or disguised as political courage, whispering that everyone else has been manipulated but you have finally woken up. Antisemitism may be the oldest conspiracy theory humanity has ever refused to bury, and it survives precisely because it flatters the person it is infecting.

In America the danger is no abstraction. The Anti-Defamation League documented 6,274 antisemitic incidents in 2025, roughly five times the level recorded a decade earlier. The overall number fell from the extraordinary 2024 peak, but physical assaults reached the highest level in the history of the ADL's audit, attacks involving deadly weapons rose sharply, and three people were killed in antisemitic attacks in the United States that year.¹ That number should stop us. But numbers rarely break a heart. Names do.

When Hatred Became Murder Again

On May 21, 2025, Yaron Lischinsky and Sarah Milgrim, two young Israeli Embassy staff members, were shot and killed outside the Capital Jewish Museum in Washington, D.C. Eleven days later, people walking peacefully in Boulder, Colorado, calling attention to the hostages held in Gaza, were attacked with incendiary devices, and an elderly victim later died of her injuries. That same year, Pennsylvania Governor Josh Shapiro's residence was firebombed during Passover while his family was inside.²

These incidents differed in circumstance, perpetrator, and legal posture, and they should not be collapsed into one simplistic narrative. But together they say something undeniable. Jew-hatred is no longer something an American can comfortably file behind museum glass. It is alive. The FBI's newly released 2025 data sharpens the point: of 2,408 reported religion-based hate-crime incidents nationally, 1,528 were anti-Jewish, nearly two-thirds of the total.³ America has seen this poison before. So has the world. And on October 7, 2023, we watched what happens when the hatred leaves the slogan and picks up a rifle.

October 7 Was Not a Metaphor

On the morning of October 7, Hamas-led armed groups breached Israel's border from Gaza and attacked civilian communities, a music festival, military sites, roads, and homes. Approximately 1,200 people were killed, most of them civilians, and more than 250 were abducted into Gaza.⁴ After examining attack sites, videos, photographs, satellite imagery, and witness testimony, Human Rights Watch concluded that Hamas-led groups committed war crimes and crimes against humanity, including murder and hostage-taking.⁵ The United Nations Special Representative on Sexual Violence in Conflict later reported reasonable grounds to believe that rape, including gang rape, occurred at multiple locations during the attack.⁶

This matters because of what happened almost immediately afterward. Not responsible questioning, and not the careful examination of individual claims that genuinely did require correction as evidence emerged, but denial of the event itself. The slaughter became "resistance." The evidence became "Zionist propaganda." The victims became suspects. That inversion should be familiar to anyone who understands the history of antisemitism, because Jew-hatred rarely stops at hating the Jew. Eventually it has to accuse the Jew of causing whatever was done to him.

An honest update belongs here. The remaining hostages seized on October 7 were released under the October 2025 ceasefire,⁷ so we should not speak as though living hostages remain hidden in tunnels today. Their release does not erase what happened, and it does not resolve the wider conflict either. Major fighting declined after October 2025, yet strikes continued, Hamas's disarmament remained unresolved, and negotiations over Israeli withdrawal and Gaza's postwar administration remained unsettled as of August 2026.⁸ Memory has to be accurate if it is going to be holy.

Six Million Reasons Memory Matters

Before October 7 came another number. Six million. Six million Jewish men, women, and children murdered by Nazi Germany and its collaborators. Not legend, not propaganda, not an approximation invented after the war, but a historical conclusion built from German records, deportation schedules, demographic reconstruction, killing-center documentation, eyewitness and perpetrator testimony, Einsatzgruppen reports, and camp records. The United States Holocaust Memorial Museum describes the Holocaust as the systematic, state-sponsored persecution and murder of six million European Jews.⁹ Nearly two of every three Jews living in Europe before the war were murdered.¹⁰

There were trains. There were lists. There were killing squads and gas chambers. There were people whose bureaucratic assignment on a given morning was to calculate how many human beings could be transported efficiently toward death. And now, while some survivors are still alive to read it, young people type Holocaust jokes into their phones for applause. "Hitler was right." "Six million wasn't enough." Oven jokes. Gas-chamber memes. That is not rebellion against political correctness. It is moral rot dressed up as courage. And Christians have an additional reason to tremble before joining in, because the people murdered at Auschwitz belonged to the same people into whom our Messiah was born.

The Tracks Nobody Bombed

One corner of Holocaust history explains something outsiders often miss about modern Israel. In 1944, Jewish organizations begged Allied governments to strike Auschwitz-Birkenau, its gas chambers, or the rail lines feeding victims into the killing complex. American officials refused, citing accuracy, military priorities, the diversion of air assets, and doubt that bombing would accomplish the rescue. The debate remains genuinely complex, and responsible historians warn against pretending that bombing Auschwitz would certainly have saved the hundreds of thousands already murdered there.

But one fact still burns. Within days of one American rejection, U.S. bombers struck the I.G. Farben synthetic-oil and rubber complex near Auschwitz, less than five miles from the killing center.¹¹ They could reach the region. The extermination facilities were simply not the target.

That history settles no contemporary argument about Israeli military policy, and it grants no government moral immunity. Israel, like every state, remains bound by the laws of armed conflict and accountable for its conduct. But it explains the phrase Never Again. For many Jews that is not motivational copy. It is accumulated historical memory, and it means that Jewish survival will never again depend entirely on whether someone else's government decides Jewish lives are strategically worth saving. You do not have to agree with any given Israeli prime minister to understand that. You only have to know the history.

The Old Lie Learned the Algorithm

The poison did not stay in Europe. It adapted, and now it travels at fiber-optic speed. One of its favorite claims is that a hidden Jewish network secretly controls finance, media, government, war, education, or culture. There is nothing new in this. The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, perhaps the most infamous antisemitic conspiracy text of the modern era, pretended to expose secret Jewish plans for world domination. It was fraudulent from the first page. The supposed meetings never happened, the "elders" never existed, and large sections were plagiarized from Maurice Joly's 1864 French political satire, a work that was not even about Jews. By 1921 The Times of London had publicly demonstrated the plagiarism, and courts, historians, journalists, and governments exposed the document repeatedly as a forgery.¹²

Yet more than a century later its central mythology survives, and only the vocabulary changes. "The Jews" becomes "the globalists." The secret Jewish government becomes "the cabal." The architecture underneath stays exactly the same. It is a worldview organized around an invisible enemy so powerful that every piece of contrary evidence becomes further proof of the conspiracy. That is why this kind of antisemitism is nearly impossible to answer with facts. Its premise is unfalsifiable. If Jews succeed, it is conspiracy; if they suffer, manipulation; if they defend themselves, aggression; if they are defenseless, weakness. The accused is never granted a condition in which he is allowed to be innocent.

The Poison Entered Politics Too

Here Christians have to reject tribalism outright, because antisemitism does not belong to one side. It has surfaced on the political left and the political right. It has surfaced in revolutionary movements and nationalist movements and Islamist movements. And, shamefully, it has surfaced under Christian language. So the standard can never be "Do people on the other side do it?" The real question is whether I will confront it when someone on my own side does.

New York City shows why precise language matters. Mayor Zohran Mamdani took office January 1, 2026. His public record includes sustained and severe criticism of the Israeli government and of Zionism, and as a candidate he argued that Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu should be arrested under the International Criminal Court warrant, though he later acknowledged that the city itself has no legal authority to execute it.¹³ On his first day, Mamdani revoked executive orders issued after September 26, 2024, an action that swept away former Mayor Eric Adams's 2025 order directing city agencies to recognize the International Holocaust Remembrance Alliance working definition of antisemitism.¹⁴ Accuracy demands the next sentence, though. Mamdani then preserved the Mayor's Office to Combat Antisemitism in his own Executive Order No. 2.¹⁵ Both facts are true, and both belong in any honest account.

So do the numbers. In January 2026 the NYPD recorded 31 anti-Jewish hate-crime incidents, up from 11 the previous January, an increase of 182 percent. Through the first seven months of 2026, anti-Jewish incidents made up 56.9 percent of all confirmed hate crimes in the city, though Jewish residents are roughly 10 percent of the population.¹⁶ Those figures do not prove that a mayor caused a hate crime; correlation is not causation. But they make it impossible to wave away Jewish fear. Leaders of every party should grasp that rhetoric has a social environment around it, and that a government can be criticized forcefully without building a moral permission structure in which Jewish neighbors start wondering whether they are safe.

The standard has to apply everywhere or it applies nowhere. In Michigan, Democratic Senate nominee Abdul El-Sayed drew controversy during the 2026 primary for campaigning with streamer Hasan Piker, whose rhetoric Jewish organizations and political figures had denounced as antisemitic. El-Sayed rejects antisemitism and later distanced himself from some of Piker's remarks.¹⁷ Accuracy matters there too, and so does consistency. If we condemn antisemitism only when naming it wounds the opposing tribe, we are not opposing antisemitism at all. We are using Jews as political ammunition, and that has to stop as surely as the memes do.

Hamas Put Its Hatred in Writing

With Hamas we do not need a conspiracy theory, because we have documents. The United States has designated Hamas a Foreign Terrorist Organization since 1997, and the European Union covers it under its terrorism sanctions framework.¹⁸ The 1988 Hamas Covenant contains explicitly antisemitic language, invoking a hadith about an end-times conflict in which Muslims kill Jews, painting a conspiratorial picture of Jewish power, and folding in mythology drawn straight from The Protocols of the Elders of Zion.¹⁹

Honesty requires the other half of the record. Hamas issued a new political document in 2017 that softened its rhetoric significantly, stating that its conflict was with "the Zionist project" rather than with Jews as Jews, and accepting a Palestinian state along pre-1967 lines as a formula of national consensus without recognizing Israel. That development deserves acknowledgment. So does the fact that the 2017 document never formally repealed the 1988 Covenant, and that Hamas's conduct on October 7 made it very hard to argue the organization had abandoned systematic violence.²⁰

One more distinction is not optional. Hamas is not a synonym for Muslims, and Islamism is not a synonym for every Muslim neighbor. A Christian who fights jihadist antisemitism by cultivating contempt for Muslims has simply swallowed a different bottle of the same poison. The Muslim family raising children next door is not Hamas. The Muslim dissident fleeing an Islamist regime is not Hamas. The Muslim doctor treating your child is not Hamas. The Christian command is hard precisely because it refuses the easy road: name evil precisely, oppose it courageously, and love the human being standing in front of you. Anything less is intellectual laziness wearing the costume of discernment.

Gaza and the Obligation to Use Words Carefully

No part of this conversation demands more discipline than Gaza. Palestinian suffering is real. Children have died. Families have been destroyed. Hospitals, homes, schools, roads, and whole neighborhoods have been devastated. Anyone who believes every human being bears tzelem Elohim, the image of God, has to be able to say that without a single qualification attached. Israeli suffering does not make Palestinian suffering imaginary, and Palestinian suffering does not erase October 7. Truth is not a seesaw where one side has to fall for the other to rise.

And "genocide" is not simply a stronger word for horrifying civilian death. Under Article II of the 1948 Genocide Convention, genocide requires specified acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial, or religious group as such.²¹ That specific intent is the heart of the legal definition. In January 2024 the International Court of Justice ordered provisional measures in South Africa v. Israel, finding that at least some of the rights South Africa asserted were plausible, including the right of Palestinians to protection from acts prohibited by the Convention. But the Court stated expressly that, at the provisional-measures stage, it was not deciding the merits of the genocide allegation.²² That distinction has been mangled endlessly in public argument. The order was neither a finding that Israel was innocent of every alleged violation nor a judgment that Israel had committed genocide. It was an interim judicial step while the underlying claim stayed unadjudicated.

Christians should handle words more carefully than an algorithm does. We can mourn Palestinian civilians without falsifying the law, and condemn Hamas without pretending every Israeli action is automatically lawful. We can recognize that Palestinian armed groups have operated from or near civilian structures while also recognizing that civilian objects do not lose all legal protection simply because a belligerent makes accusations about them. A United Nations commission has noted evidence that Hamas and other armed groups used some civilian sites for military purposes, while also stating that it could not independently verify every Israeli allegation.²³ Reality is more demanding than propaganda. That is exactly why the truth is worth the extra effort.

Then Paul Walks Into the Room

Now we reach the part Christians cannot hand off to politics. Romans 9 through 11.

Paul is not discussing Israel from a comfortable distance. He is Jewish. He calls himself "an Israelite, from the seed of Avraham, of the tribe of Binyamin" in Romans 11:1, and his anguish in Romans 9 is almost unbearable to read. He says that to Israel belong the adoption, the glory, the covenants, the giving of the Torah, the worship, the promises, and the patriarchs, and that from Israel, according to the flesh, came the Messiah. Then he asks the question directly: has God rejected His people? His answer is μὴ γένοιτο, mē genoito. May it never be. Absolutely not. By no means. It is one of Paul's most characteristic emphatic repudiations, the linguistic equivalent of a door slammed shut.²⁴

Then he hands Gentile believers an image the church should never have forgotten. An olive tree. There are natural branches, and there are branches broken off, and then there is something else entirely: us. Wild olive shoots, grafted in. Paul does not tell the Gentile believer that he grew a better tree. He does not say the wild branch replaced the root. He says the reverse. "Remember that it is not you who support the root, but the root supports you" (Romans 11:18).

That one sentence should make Christian antisemitism impossible. You do not carry the root. The root carries you. Your Messiah is Jewish. His mother was Jewish. His apostles were Jewish. The prophets were Jewish. The covenants through which you came to understand redemption came through Israel, and the Scriptures Yeshua called the Word of God were Israel's Scriptures. The Last Supper was not a European church service. The cross bore the body of a Jewish Messiah, and the empty tomb announced the resurrection of Israel's Messiah. Christianity does not become more Christian by becoming less Jewish. It only becomes less intelligible.

The Warning Hidden in Genesis 12:3

Go farther back, to Genesis 12, where God calls Abram and says, "I will bless those who bless you, but the one who treats you lightly I will curse; and in you all the families of the earth will be blessed." There is something in the Hebrew worth slowing down for. The first negative expression uses the root קלל, q-l-l, carrying the sense of making light of, treating as insignificant, dishonoring, holding in contempt. God's answering verb is stronger: ארר, ʾ-r-r, to curse.²⁵ I want to be careful here rather than mechanical, because translation choices differ and the point is not a one-word equation. But the asymmetry is striking. The warning is not reserved only for the person who tries to annihilate Abraham's family. Contempt matters. Treating lightly matters. Despising matters.

And the Abrahamic promise is not tribal favoritism. Its destination is written into the same verse: all the families of the earth. Israel is chosen not because God hates the nations but because through Abraham's seed God intends blessing to reach the nations, a story that reaches its climax in Yeshua. The nations are not invited to destroy the root. They are invited to receive its fruit.

You Cannot Love the Messiah and Despise His People

This is the contradiction Christian antisemitism can never survive. Imagine standing before Yeshua and explaining why you learned contempt for Jews. Imagine telling the Son of David that His people are genetically fraudulent. Imagine telling the King of the Jews that the Jews secretly control everything. Imagine making an oven joke in front of the Jewish Messiah. Imagine explaining that His Father's covenant people became inconvenient to your theology, so you replaced them. There is no version of that conversation that ends well.

Replacement theology has taken different forms across Christian history, and thoughtful Christians disagree about the precise relationship between Israel and the ekklēsia. But Romans 11 draws a boundary no faithful reading should cross. Do not boast against the branches. Paul does not merely suggest it. He commands it. The arrogance of the grafted branch is not maturity. It is amnesia.

The First Antisemite We Must Confront

That brings it home. The most useful question is not where the antisemites are out there. It is what happens inside me when antisemitism comes from someone I already like. When the meme comes from my political side. When the joke lands in my group chat. When the preacher I respect announces that God is finished with Israel. When someone starts in on Jewish money, Jewish control, Jewish blood, "real Jews," secret loyalties. When the Holocaust humor appears and everyone laughs. Do I confront it, or do I suddenly become very interested in nuance? That is the test, because anybody can rebuke the enemy's sin. Covenant faithfulness begins the moment the truth costs me something among my friends.

So do something concrete, not someday but as a settled practice. Learn Romans 9 through 11 until the olive tree lives inside you. Learn the old antisemitic tropes well enough to recognize them when someone only swaps the labels. Refuse Holocaust jokes outright. Distinguish criticism of Israel from hatred of Jews, and then hold the people around you to the same distinction. Refuse to smear Muslims even as you confront Islamist antisemitism. Refuse to treat Palestinian suffering as irrelevant, and refuse to turn Jewish suffering into political currency. And when antisemitism shows up on your own side, say something. Not later. Then. Because silence is one of the environments in which hatred learns that it is safe.

The Poison Came Home

There is a choice in front of us. We can keep drifting, one meme and one joke and one conspiracy and one silence and one excuse at a time. We can become people who know enough Scripture to quote Romans but not enough to tremble before Romans 11. We can wear the cross while nursing contempt for the people through whom the Crucified One came.

Or we can remember. Remember Abraham and Sinai and Jerusalem. Remember Auschwitz. Remember October 7. Remember the Palestinian children whose deaths should grieve anyone who believes in the image of God. Remember that hatred does not turn holy just because we aim it at people we have labeled the enemy. And remember the tree. We were not the root. We were grafted in. Mercy did that. Grace did that. The covenant faithfulness of the God of Abraham, Isaac, and Jacob did that.

The poison came home. But repentance can come home too. The wild branch can remember where its life comes from. The follower of Yeshua can refuse the old hatred even when it arrives in new clothes, and can stand before a Jewish neighbor without superiority, without embarrassment, without conspiracy, and without fear, and say plainly: I see what is happening. I will not participate in it. I will not laugh. I will not spread the lie. I will not curse the root that carries me. Because the Messiah I follow is Yeshua ben David, a Son of Israel, a Son of Judah, and the King who taught me to love my neighbor is still, and forever will be, the King of the Jews.

Annotated Footnotes

1. Anti-Defamation League, Audit of Antisemitic Incidents 2025 (New York: ADL, May 6, 2026). The ADL recorded 6,274 incidents in 2025, 33 percent fewer than the record 9,354 in 2024 but roughly five times the number recorded a decade earlier. Physical assaults rose to 203, the highest the organization had recorded, while deadly-weapon assaults increased 39 percent. The audit includes both criminal and noncriminal harassment, vandalism, and assault, and therefore should not be confused with FBI hate-crime statistics.

2. Anti-Defamation League, Audit of Antisemitic Incidents 2025. ADL includes the Washington museum shooting, the Boulder firebombing, and the Shapiro residence attack among significant incidents involving deadly weapons during 2025. The Boulder victim who later died brought the number of persons murdered in antisemitic attacks that year to three.

3. Anti-Defamation League, "2025 Marked Third-Highest Year on Record for Anti-Jewish Hate Crimes, FBI Reports," August 17, 2026. The organization summarizes newly released FBI data showing 1,528 single-bias anti-Jewish incidents among 2,408 religion-based incidents nationally. FBI reporting and ADL auditing use different methodologies and should not be treated as interchangeable datasets.

4. United Nations, Special Committee to Investigate Israeli Practices, report A/79/363, September 20, 2024. The report records approximately 1,200 killed and at least 252 taken hostage during the Hamas-led assault. Other official and journalistic counts commonly use 251, because identification and classification changed as investigators reconciled missing-person records.

5. Human Rights Watch, "'I Can't Erase All the Blood from My Mind': Palestinian Armed Groups' October 7 Assault on Israel," July 17, 2024. HRW concluded that Hamas's military wing and other participating armed groups committed numerous war crimes and crimes against humanity, including murder and wrongful imprisonment.

6. United Nations Security Council, "Reasonable Grounds to Believe Conflict-Related Sexual Violence Occurred in Israel During 7 October Attacks," SC/15621, March 11, 2024. Pramila Patten's mission reported reasonable grounds to believe rape and gang rape occurred in multiple locations. "Reasonable grounds" is the evidentiary formulation used by the mission and should not be exaggerated into a judicial criminal conviction.

7. Reuters, "Who Is Khalil Al-Hayya, the Hamas Leader Who Met Kushner in Egypt?" August 17, 2026. Reuters reports that negotiations leading to the October 2025 ceasefire resulted in the release of the remaining hostages seized in the October 2023 attack. This is a critical correction for material originally drafted while hostages remained captive.

8. Reuters, "US Provides $206 Million for Gaza Force Despite Deadlocked Peace Plan," August 19, 2026. The October 2025 ceasefire dramatically reduced major combat but did not end violence. As of August 2026 negotiations remained stalled over Hamas disarmament, Israeli withdrawal, and implementation of a proposed international stabilization arrangement.

9. United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, "How Many People Did the Nazis Murder?" Holocaust Encyclopedia. USHMM documents approximately six million Jewish victims using Nazi records, demographic evidence, transportation documentation, postwar investigations, and other sources. Approximately 2.7 million were murdered at killing centers, approximately two million in mass shootings and related massacres, and hundreds of thousands more through ghettos, camps, deprivation, forced labor, and other violence.

10. United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, "Introduction to the Holocaust." Approximately two-thirds of Europe's prewar Jewish population was murdered by Nazi Germany, its allies, and collaborators.

11. United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, "The United States and the Holocaust: Why Auschwitz Was Not Bombed." Requests from Jewish organizations to bomb Auschwitz or its killing facilities were rejected by the U.S. War Department. Assistant Secretary of War John J. McCloy argued that such an operation would divert substantial air support and had doubtful efficacy. Within roughly one week of his August 14, 1944 rejection, U.S. bombers attacked the I.G. Farben Buna works less than five miles from Auschwitz-Birkenau. Historians continue to debate what bombing the camp or rail network could realistically have accomplished, so the episode should not be simplified into the claim that bombing would certainly have stopped the Holocaust.

12. United States Holocaust Memorial Museum, "An Antisemitic Conspiracy: The Protocols of the Elders of Zion"; idem, "Protocols of the Elders of Zion: Key Dates." The Protocols falsely purported to record secret Jewish meetings concerning world domination. In 1921 The Times demonstrated extensive plagiarism from Maurice Joly's Dialogue aux enfers entre Machiavel et Montesquieu (1864), a political satire containing no Jewish conspiracy. The forgery nevertheless became enormously influential in twentieth-century antisemitic propaganda.

13. Associated Press, "Mamdani Says NYC Can't Arrest Netanyahu but the Federal Government Should," July 2026; Reuters, "Why New York's Mamdani Cannot Have Israel's Netanyahu Arrested," July 22, 2026. Mamdani had previously discussed arresting Netanyahu pursuant to the International Criminal Court warrant, but acknowledged after legal review that New York City has no mechanism to execute an ICC warrant. The United States is not a party to the Rome Statute.

14. City of New York, Executive Order No. 52, June 8, 2025; City of New York, Executive Order No. 1, January 1, 2026. Eric Adams's Order No. 52 directed agencies to consider the IHRA working definition and its eleven examples. Mamdani's first executive order continued pre-September 26, 2024 orders while revoking orders issued on or after that date, thereby revoking Order No. 52 among others.

15. City of New York, Executive Order No. 2, January 2026. Mamdani's order expressly establishes a Mayor's Office to Combat Antisemitism and directs it to coordinate reporting, victim services, education, law enforcement liaison, and policy recommendations. This fact materially qualifies claims that the administration simply "eliminated" New York City's antisemitism infrastructure.

16. New York City Police Department, January 2026 crime statistics; NYPD, July 2026 crime statistics. Anti-Jewish hate-crime incidents increased from 11 in January 2025 to 31 in January 2026, a 182 percent increase. Through July 2026, 205 of 360 confirmed hate crimes were anti-Jewish, or 56.9 percent, compared with approximately 10 percent of the city population being Jewish. NYPD cautions that hate-crime figures are preliminary and may be reclassified after investigation.

17. Associated Press, "El-Sayed Distances Himself from Popular Streamer's Comments on Israel and Jewish Americans," August 2026; Jewish Telegraphic Agency, "Michigan Democrats, Jewish Leaders Uneasy as Senate Candidate Set to Rally with Hasan Piker," April 6, 2026. El-Sayed campaigned with Piker during the Democratic primary. Jewish organizations and several Democratic officials criticized Piker's rhetoric as antisemitic; Piker rejects that characterization. Following additional controversy in August, El-Sayed distanced himself from specific remarks while stating that his campaign alone represents his political views.

18. U.S. Department of State, Country Reports on Terrorism 2023, s.v. "Hamas"; Council of the European Union, "Sanctions Against Terrorism." The United States designated Hamas a Foreign Terrorist Organization on October 8, 1997. Hamas is likewise covered by European Union terrorism sanctions.

19. "The Covenant of the Islamic Resistance Movement," August 18, 1988; Mark A. Green, "Hamas: Words and Deeds," Wilson Center, October 24, 2023. Article 7 invokes the well-known hadith concerning Muslims fighting Jews; other portions employ sweeping antisemitic conspiracy claims, and Article 32 invokes The Protocols of the Elders of Zion.

20. Green, "Hamas: Words and Deeds." The 2017 Hamas political document softened several formulations in the 1988 Covenant and asserted that Hamas's struggle was against Zionism rather than Jews because they are Jews. The Wilson Center notes, however, that the later document did not formally repeal or supersede the earlier charter. Interpretation of the relationship between the two documents should therefore acknowledge both continuity and rhetorical change rather than pretending the 2017 text does not exist.

21. United Nations, Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide, December 9, 1948, art. II. Genocide requires one or more enumerated acts committed with intent to destroy, in whole or in part, a national, ethnical, racial, or religious group as such. This special intent distinguishes genocide juridically from other grave violations, including some war crimes and crimes against humanity.

22. International Court of Justice, Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide in the Gaza Strip (South Africa v. Israel), Order of January 26, 2024, paras. 35–36, 54. The Court concluded that certain rights claimed by South Africa were plausible for purposes of provisional protection, specifically Palestinians' right to protection from acts prohibited by the Convention and South Africa's right to seek compliance with the Convention. It expressly stated that it was not making a definitive determination of the underlying rights or the merits of the genocide allegation.

23. United Nations Independent International Commission of Inquiry, A/HRC/56/CRP.4, paras. 89–91. The Commission noted reports and evidence indicating that Hamas and other armed groups had at times used civilian structures and areas for military purposes and fired rockets near residential locations, while also stating that it could not independently verify all Israeli evidence and allegations. A later UN inquiry likewise discussed Israeli claims regarding hospitals while noting disputes over the evidence.

24. Frederick William Danker, ed., A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature, 3rd ed. (Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000), s.v. γίνομαι; Douglas J. Moo, The Letter to the Romans, 2nd ed., New International Commentary on the New Testament (Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2018), discussion of Rom. 11:1. The formula μὴ γένοιτο occurs repeatedly in Paul as an emphatic rejection. "God forbid" is traditional English idiom rather than a literal reference to God in the Greek wording.

25. Ludwig Koehler, Walter Baumgartner, and Johann Jakob Stamm, The Hebrew and Aramaic Lexicon of the Old Testament, trans. and ed. M. E. J. Richardson (Leiden: Brill, 1994–2000), s.vv. קלל and ארר; cf. Gen. 12:3. The juxtaposition is rhetorically significant: the one who "makes light of" or treats Abram contemptuously encounters God's stronger covenantal response. Translation choices differ, so the semantic observation should not be reduced to a mechanical one-word equivalence.

Bibliography

Anti-Defamation League. Audit of Antisemitic Incidents 2025. New York: Anti-Defamation League, 2026.

Associated Press. "El-Sayed Distances Himself from Popular Streamer's Comments on Israel and Jewish Americans." August 2026.

Associated Press. "Mamdani Says NYC Can't Arrest Netanyahu but the Federal Government Should." July 2026.

Cranfield, C. E. B. A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Epistle to the Romans. 2 vols. International Critical Commentary. Edinburgh: T&T Clark, 1975–1979.

Council of the European Union. "Sanctions Against Terrorism." Brussels: Council of the European Union, 2026.

Danker, Frederick William, ed. A Greek-English Lexicon of the New Testament and Other Early Christian Literature. 3rd ed. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 2000.

Green, Mark A. "Hamas: Words and Deeds." Wilson Center. October 24, 2023.

Human Rights Watch. "'I Can't Erase All the Blood from My Mind': Palestinian Armed Groups' October 7 Assault on Israel." July 17, 2024.

International Court of Justice. Application of the Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide in the Gaza Strip (South Africa v. Israel). Order of January 26, 2024.

Keener, Craig S. The IVP Bible Background Commentary: New Testament. 2nd ed. Downers Grove, IL: IVP Academic, 2014.

Koehler, Ludwig, Walter Baumgartner, and Johann Jakob Stamm. The Hebrew and Aramaic Lexicon of the Old Testament. Translated and edited under the supervision of M. E. J. Richardson. Leiden: Brill, 1994–2000.

Moo, Douglas J. The Letter to the Romans. 2nd ed. New International Commentary on the New Testament. Grand Rapids: Eerdmans, 2018.

New York City Police Department. "January 2026 Crime Statistics." New York: NYPD, 2026.

New York City Police Department. "July 2026 Crime Statistics." New York: NYPD, 2026.

Reuters. "US Provides $206 Million for Gaza Force Despite Deadlocked Peace Plan." August 19, 2026.

Reuters. "Why New York's Mamdani Cannot Have Israel's Netanyahu Arrested." July 22, 2026.

Stern, David H. Complete Jewish Bible. Clarksville, MD: Jewish New Testament Publications, 1998.

United Nations. Convention on the Prevention and Punishment of the Crime of Genocide. December 9, 1948.

United Nations Independent International Commission of Inquiry on the Occupied Palestinian Territory, Including East Jerusalem, and Israel. Detailed Findings, A/HRC/56/CRP.4. 2024.

United Nations Security Council. "Reasonable Grounds to Believe Conflict-Related Sexual Violence Occurred in Israel During 7 October Attacks." SC/15621. March 11, 2024.

United States Department of State. Country Reports on Terrorism 2023. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of State.

United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. "An Antisemitic Conspiracy: The Protocols of the Elders of Zion." Holocaust Encyclopedia.

United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. "How Many People Did the Nazis Murder?" Holocaust Encyclopedia.

United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. "Introduction to the Holocaust." Holocaust Encyclopedia.

United States Holocaust Memorial Museum. "The United States and the Holocaust: Why Auschwitz Was Not Bombed." Holocaust Encyclopedia.

Wright, N. T. "Romans." In The New Interpreter's Bible, vol. 10. Nashville: Abingdon, 2002.

© 2026 Dr. Shawn M. Greener. All Rights Reserved.